- UID
- 223438
- 帖子
- 280
- 主题
- 8
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2016-4-19
|
9#
发表于 2013-4-22 12:15
| 只看该作者
I view the benchmark as what you should invest in if you don’t have any views. An investor might prefer a portfolio with a 10% standard deviation. I could optimize and find the optimal 10% standard deviation portfolio and use that as a benchmark before putting any of my views on top of it. The 10% standard deviation portfolio would not be consistent through time and would adjust to changing market conditions. That’s a problem for most people since they prefer a pre-set list of securities, like 60/40 allocation between stocks/bonds.
Regardless, for many an alternatives fund, they aren’t performing a benchmark-relative optimization anyway. They are optimizing based on total returns. For instance, there’s no investment out there that will return the risk-free rate plus 8%. Why bother pretending that there is?
Well that would be because they link performance fees to “benchmarks”. Well then, just call 8% plus risk-free the performance target and say you try to make absolute returns without too much risk. |
|