Katherine Epler, a self-employed corporate finance consultant, is working with another new client, Thurber Electronics. Epler is discussing the static trade-off capital structure theory with her client, and makes the following comments:
Comment 1: Under the static trade-off theory, the graph of a company’s weighted average cost of capital has a U shape.
Comment 2: According to the static trade-off theory, every firm will have the same optimal amount of debt that maximizes the value of the firm.
With respect to Epler’s comments:
Epler’s first comment is correct. When graphing a company’s WACC according to the static trade-off theory, the WACC will initially decline as a company increases its tax savings through the use of debt. However, as more debt is added, the WACC will reach a point where it increases due to the increasing costs of financial distress. Note that when graphing the static trade-off theory, the WACC looks like a U shape, while the value of the firm looks like an upside down U shape. This makes sense because the value of the firm is maximized when the WACC is minimized. Epler’s second comment is incorrect. Every firm will have a different optimal capital structure that will depend on the firm’s operating risk, tax situation, industry influences, and other factors. |