- UID
- 223452
- 帖子
- 418
- 主题
- 12
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2014-8-7
|
7#
发表于 2013-8-7 07:03
| 只看该作者
Hi guys,
Two quick things - hopefully, not to put too sharp a point on this whole thing:
1) Just to clear up any potential confusion (and inadvertently cause more confusion) - It might seem that Ex-div date and Record date try to measure the same thing, but there is a difference. Regarding cash dividends - Ex Div Date measures who is entitled to the cash payment, while Record Date measures who will actually receive the cash. In the event of some kind of trade fail or other wonkiness, a trade might take longer to settle than the standard two-day cycle. In such cases, the “buyer” might not have posession of the stock by the record date, even if they entered the transaction prior to ex-date. In this type of scenario, the fact that the buyer bought prior to ex-date entitles him to the dividend, while the prior owner (i.e. “Seller”… or more appropriately, the Seller’s broker/custodian/whatever) will actually get the cash. As the ‘seller’ is not actually entitled to the dividend, he will subsequently have to send it over to the buyer separately.
2) Shorting a stock actually puts you on the hook for the dividend (and other corp action events, too). Essentially, you’re borrowing the stock from someone and selling it to someone else. If it goes ex-div while you’re short, the awesomeness of the price drop is 100% cancelled out by you having to forward the cash dividend amount to the guy you borrowed the shares from. And for the record, whoever is on the other side of your short sale will end up getting the dividend directly from the paying agent, as he will be the official holder of record. |
|