返回列表 发帖

For which of the following firms is the Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio most appropriate for identifying undervalued or overvalued equities?

Firm A: Expected dividend growth = 6%; Cost of equity = 12%; price-to-earnings (P/E) = 12.
Firm B: Expected dividend growth = ?6%; Cost of equity = 12%; price-to-earnings (P/E) = 12.
Firm C: Expected dividend growth = 1%; Cost of equity = 12%; price-to-earnings (P/E) = 12.

A)
Firm C.
B)
Firm A.
C)
Firm B.



The formula for the PEG ratio is: PEG = (P/E) / g. It measures the tradeoff between P/E and expected dividend growth (g). For traditional growth firms, PEG ratios fall between 1 and 2. The general rule is that PEG ratios above 2 are indicative of overvalued firms (expensive), and PEG ratios below 1 are indicative of firms that are undervalued (cheap).

Firm A:

PEG = 2, indicating a stock that is appropriately priced.

Firm B:

The PEG ratio of firms with negative expected dividend growth is negative, which is meaningless. For Firm B, PEG = -2.

Firm C:

Firms with very low expected dividend growth are likely to have PEG ratios that unrealistically indicate overvalued stocks. For Firm C, PEG = 12.

TOP

The warranted or intrinsic price multiple is called the:

A)
multiple implied by the market price.
B)
justified price multiple.
C)
multiple implied by historical growth.



A justified price multiple is the warranted or intrinsic price multiple. It is the estimated fair value of that multiple.

TOP

A justified price multiple is the:

A)
warranted or intrinsic price multiple.
B)
multiple implied by historical growth.
C)
multiple implied by the market price.



A justified price multiple is the warranted or intrinsic price multiple. It is the estimated fair value of that multiple.

TOP

返回列表