- UID
- 223343
- 帖子
- 431
- 主题
- 51
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2013-9-12
|
17#
发表于 2012-3-29 17:08
| 只看该作者
Nolan Corporation (Nolan) is a successful and publicly-traded U.S. company that has operated for many years. It manufactures various sporting goods and in recent years, established three subsidiary companies, Soccer Inc. (Soccer), Hockey Inc. (Hockey), and Lacrosse Inc. (Lacrosse). Soccer and Hockey are located in the U.S. and Lacrosse is located in Canada.
Given that its stock is widely followed by analysts, Nolan regularly communicates its earnings expectations to the market.
Nolan’s most recent financial statements are provided in Exhibit 1.Exhibit 1: Consolidated financial statements for Nolan Corporation Balance Sheet As of December 31 (in thousands) |
| 2008 | 2007 |
Assets |
|
|
Cash | $1,230 | $1,805 |
Accounts receivable | 4,900 | 4,610 |
Inventory | 7,240 | 4,830 |
Fixed assets, net | 18,300 | 16,500 |
Total assets | $31,670 | $27,745 |
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
Accounts payable | $1,860 | $1,200 |
Current portion of long-term debt | 3,306 | 3,095 |
Long-term debt | 22,000 | 20,000 |
Total liabilities | $27,166 | $24,295 |
Common stock | 2,000 | 2,000 |
Retained earnings | 2,504 | 1,450 |
Total Liabilities and Equity | $31,670 | $27,745 |
Income Statement Year Ended December 31, 2008 (in thousands) |
Sales | $21,500 |
Cost of goods sold | (13,620) |
Depreciation expense | (2,100) |
SG&A expense | (1,750) |
Interest expense | (1,420) |
Taxes | (910) |
Net income | $1,700 |
Cash flow Statement Year Ended December 31, 2008 (in thousands) |
Cash from operations | $1,760 |
Cash from investing | (3,900) |
Cash from financing | 1,565 |
Change in cash | $(575) |
Nolan has calculated accrual ratios for its subsidiaries, Soccer and Hockey, in Exhibit 2.
Exhibit 2: Accrual ratios for Soccer and Hockey
Accrual Ratio |
2008 |
2007 |
Soccer Inc. |
13.5% |
11.4% |
Hockey Inc. |
10.7% |
11.2% |
To protect itself from a multitude of business and financial risks, Nolan uses derivatives to manage its risks. It has engaged in several different hedges during the year, including a net investment hedge of a foreign subsidiary, a cash flow hedge, and a fair value hedge.Which of the following statements best describes the term forecast error? A)
| The difference in a firm’s reported earnings and the consensus buy-side earnings forecast. |
| B)
| The difference in a firm’s reported earnings and the firm’s internal earnings forecast communicated to the market. |
| C)
| The difference in a firm’s reported earnings and the consensus sell-side earnings forecast. |
|
The difference in a firm’s reported earnings and the consensus sell-side earnings forecast is known as forecast error. The consensus sell-side forecast is a benchmark the firm is trying to meet. Firms periodically communicate their earnings expectations to the market in order to move the benchmark. (Study Session 7, LOS 26.c)
Using Nolan’s consolidated balance sheet, which of the following amounts is closest to the accruals ratio for 2008.
The first step is to compute the beginning and ending balances of NOA.
| 2008 | 2007 | Total assets | $31,670 | $27,745 | Cash | (1,230) | (1,805) | Operating assets | $30,440 | $25,940 | | | | Total liabilities | $27,166 | $24,295 | Current portion of long-term debt | (3,306) | (3,095) | Long-term debt | (22,000) | (20,000) | Operating liabilities | $1,860 | $1,200 | | | | Net operating assets | $28,580 | $24,740 |
Next, calculate the average NOA for 2008 of $26,660 [($28,580 ROAEND + $24,740 NOABEG) / 2].
Finally, calculate the accruals ratio for 2008: ($28,580 NOAEND − $24,740 NOABEG) / $26,660 NOAAVG = 14.4%. (Study Session 7, LOS 26.d)
Using Nolan’s consolidated income statement and cash flow statement, which of the following amounts is closest to the accruals ratio for 2008. (Note: for the purposes of this question, assume that the average NOA is $24,000.)
The relevant equations to consider are as follows:
AccrualsCF = NI − CFO − CFI
First, calculate the aggregate accruals as follows:
Net income | $1,700 | Cash from operations | (1,760) | Cash from investing | 3,900 | Accruals | $3,840 |
Next, using the average NOA of $24,000, calculate the accruals ratio for 2008: $3,840 Accruals / $24,000 NOAAVG = 16.0%. (Study Session 7, LOS 26.d)
Using the information regarding the accrual ratios of the Soccer and Hockey subsidiaries, which of the following statements is most appropriate? A)
| Hockey’s earnings quality is lower than Soccer’s and its earnings quality is deteriorating compared to Soccer’s. |
| B)
| Hockey’s earnings quality is higher than Soccer’s and its earnings quality is improving compared to Soccer’s. |
| C)
| Hockey’s earnings quality is higher than Soccer’s but its earnings quality is deteriorating compared to Soccer’s. |
|
Hockey’s earnings quality is higher than Soccer’s because its accrual ratios are lower in both years (10.7% and 11.2% versus 13.5% and 11.4%). And Hockey’s earnings quality is improving (accrual ratios are decreasing from 11.2% to 10.7%) while Soccer’s earnings quality is deteriorating (accrual ratios are increasing from 11.4% to 13.5%). (Study Session 7, LOS 26.d)
In examining Nolan’s consolidated income statement for 2008, which of the following definitions of earnings result in the same amount? A)
| EBIT and income from continuing operations. |
| B)
| Net income and income from continuing operations. |
| C)
| EBITDA and income from continuing operations. |
|
Income from continuing operations is a subtotal equal to Nolan’s earnings before any “below the line” items are considered. Only discontinued operations and extraordinary items are reported “below the line”, net of tax. In this case, there are no “below the line” items, so income from continuing operations and net income would be the same. (Study Session 7, LOS 25.a)
With respect to a hedge undertaken in the Lacrosse subsidiary that utilizes a put option to protect one of its equity investments, which of the following best describes the accounting treatment for the hedge under U.S. GAAP? A)
| Unrealized gains and losses from the derivative are recognized in the income statement. |
| B)
| Unrealized gains and losses from the derivative bypass the income statement and are reported in shareholders’ equity as part of other comprehensive income. |
| C)
| Only realized gains and losses from the derivative are recognized in the income statement. |
|
Lacrosse is not using the derivative to speculate. Therefore the unrealized and realized gains would NOT NECESSARILY be recognized in the income statement. Since Lacrosse is using the derivative for hedging purposes, the gain or loss recognition depends on the type of hedge.
By using the put option to hedge exposure to changes in the value of the equity investment, this is clearly an example of a fair value hedge. A fair value hedge requires unrealized gains and losses from the derivative to be recognized in the income statement. (Study Session 7, LOS 25.c) |
|