- UID
- 223323
- 帖子
- 627
- 主题
- 107
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2013-8-20
|
86#
发表于 2012-3-31 15:32
| 只看该作者
Two security analysts, Ramon Long and Sri Beujeau, disagree about certain aspects of the PEG ratio. Long argues that: "unlike typical valuation metrics that incorporate dividend discounting, the PEG ratio is unique because it generates meaningful results for firms with negative expected earnings-growth." Is Long correct? A)
| Yes, because the expected earnings-growth rate is cancelled out in the computation of the PEG ratio. |
| B)
| No, because the PEG ratio generates meaningless results for negative earnings-growth companies. |
| C)
| Yes, because the computation of the PEG ratio does not use the rate of expected earnings growth. |
|
The PEG ratio is: PEG = (P/E) / earnings growth. As such, firms with negative expected earnings growth will have a negative PEG ratio, which is meaningless. |
|