pluto01

thanks

zhouyp1982

 f

pundit

a

miguelliu

 thx

mayanfang1

 

答案和详解如下：

Q2. Correct answer is C)

Looking at Busch’s allocation, he obviously has a disproportionate amount of Matrix Technologies company stock. In 1974, U.S. Congress enacted a law (ERISA) that prohibits investment of more than 10% of defined benefit plan assets in company stock, but no such law applies to defined contribution plans. The only related provision states that employers cannot force participants to invest more than 10% in company stock. This means that employers could force employees to hold some percentage in company stock (many companies that match employee contributions will force the employee to hold those matching contributions in company stock). There is no provision that prohibits the employee from investing any amount they want in company stock; therefore, Matrix Technologies is not in violation of ERISA requirements.