返回列表 发帖
yeah, I agree.

But you know, the job market out there is very tough, even for phds.  I noticed a lot of phds from Brandeis choose industry instead of academy.  Personal opinion.

TOP

PHD >CFA =mba , this is what I think

TOP

right , they will not do that basic work

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用best_tu在2011-6-7 3:08:00的发言:

But I know a lot of finance phd are taking exams if they are in industry. CFA designation means a lot more than Phd when you talk to clients.

finance PHDs usually not facing clients, thay are facing students~

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用chalanda在2011-6-7 3:03:00的发言:

Yeap, I don't know a single case that a finance PHD takes CFA.

But I know a lot of finance phd are taking exams if they are in industry. CFA designation means a lot more than Phd when you talk to clients.

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用chalanda在2011-6-7 2:54:00的发言:

Boston is a GREAT place! A lot of good funds like state street, GMO...

I am actually not in Boston, I mean industry colleage...I am working in a fund in Denver Colorado.

TOP

本帖最后由 chalanda 于 2011-7-10 13:18 编辑

..........

TOP

天气好

[此贴子已经被作者于2011-6-7 3:02:45编辑过]

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用chalanda在2011-6-7 2:18:00的发言:

I am MIT engineering phd. I learned finance by getting A+ in almost all the classes in MIT master of finance curriculum.

I am sorry, but that makes more sense. It is tough to shift from one area to a totally different one. I found some of your ideas are not that practical. No offense.

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用chalanda在2011-6-7 2:37:00的发言:

Well. Not a lot of MIT phds take CFA. CFA helps little in find a job in quantitative/algorithmic/high-frequency trading
[此贴子已经被作者于2011-6-7 2:41:40编辑过]

sure , if you are a finance PHD , no need to take CFA , it is too basic

TOP

返回列表