shanexin

大概扫了下，老外反映跟我们差不多，都反映FSA比较tricky，上午比较有把握，下午吃不准，基本都是quants ok, qualitative sucks...

哎，数学不拿满分，惘为炎黄子孙，这下跟老外拼qualitative，要吃亏了

shanexin

看看老外考生怎么看这次二级考试的吧：

Because you gloss over important, core material like All Current/Temporal (I mean, could those questions have been any easier?) and then you slam people in portfolio mgmt and ask multiple sets on derivatives, all the while covering every single nook and cranny of material.

I know some people are going to have a problem with someone saying things like this, but I just dont see how there's benefit to testing the material in this way. The "important" topics that require so much more attention should be treated as such. You want CFAs to know the core of the material, so test them on it. Personally, I dont think the economics questions asked were anywhere NEAR as valuable as, say, Triangular arbitrage, or risk premiums. thats what you want people to know, to learn and to study, then test them on it.

koeln

the upper guy is indeed a pighead......

pighead

ok, let's say discuss any of the specific questions is against cfa code....

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-5 0:33:38编辑过]

ParisXue

楼上的兄弟，我忘记涂id了  但是在上面的格子里写上了id。 监考和我说cfa协会在阅卷前检查并帮我填上。。。没有官方确定的答案 我已经去query CFA的客服了 

furywithin

楼上的朋友们，姓名写反没关系的，放心吧

关键是id号写对就好了！

strip的duration就用maturity,基本含义，这个概念在1级notes里有讲

wilsonpang

不同意hedge fund适合conservative investor.

虽然hedge fund能对冲风险,但是监管很少,

流通性亦很低,可能一个月只得一天赎回日

ParisXue

请问一下 上午考试的时候我只写了candidate number 但是稀里糊涂忘记涂下面的数字了 我问了proctor 她说CFA会帮你填上的 将信将疑 大家又没有碰到过同样情况的？ 会不会成绩作废阿

wileyye

在上海考的，时间控制上感觉比去年考一级时好多了，论述判断对错的题目有些绕人，没把握，单纯计算容易多了。同意楼上将Hedge Fund 纳入Conservative account是正确的判断。

遗憾的是跟上面的一位老弟一样，名字填反了。

kingking

28楼的兄弟，strip duration那个题duration就是maturity吧，duration的最基本意义，notes中有讲过的

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-4 19:24:37编辑过]