- UID
- 223436
- 帖子
- 302
- 主题
- 8
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2014-8-7
|
4#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:01
| 只看该作者
I will be doing many more questions and practice exams this second time around, with a particular focus on the CFAI EOC. And do them quite a bit earlier than the final month. The exam itself was reminiscent of the CFAI texts in look and feel, but overall at a whole different level. Hard to explain unless you've actually taken it, but the bottom line is that you need to know this stuff intimately and be able to knock out the answers quickly and accurately.
My downfall was probably doing too much passive reading, not doing the questions immediately after finishing a reading, and mistaking quantity for quality. The problem is that there is just soooo much material - it takes forever just to wrap your head around it, much less reach a point where you have gotten decent at it, or mastered it. I wanted to read everything first and only then jump into the nitty-gritty of the questions. Obviously, that was a bad strategy. I failed on my first try (band 7).
Going into the exam I thought I had a decent chance, but deep down inside knew it would be an uphill battle. The exam itself had some absolutely ball-busting moments that got me flustered, especially in the AM session. Very calc intensive at times, which forced you to get the answer right the first time, as there was hardly any time to go back and try to figure out where you went wrong. Sometimes, I was convinced I had done nothing wrong, but still didn't see the answer in the choices given. Another couple of times, I drew a blank on a formula that I had known just a few days earlier. Having this happen in rapid succession knocked me off course, and I had to scramble to regain my composure. It was a horrible, awful feeling at times during the AM session....
Had the exam been a bit more qualitative, I probably would have done better. And I did put in the hours (as many as I could with a full-time job, a wife and four kids to deal with), so hardly blaming my effort at all. I took this thing seriously from the time I began studying in mid-September, but in the end, it proved to be simply too much material to master.
The second time around will be a lot easier, for sure. In retrospect, I feel that you almost need a full study-exam cycle simply to get a grip of the material and know what you're up against on exam day. Now I know why most fail the first time and the pass rate is only around 40%. Passing the exam requires you to MASTER the material. Do not underestimate exactly what that means! |
|