- UID
- 223368
- 帖子
- 251
- 主题
- 45
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2014-7-21
|
3#
发表于 2013-4-16 10:01
| 只看该作者
charly, while I have no idea what you’re referencing, I think I can guess the source of the confusion. Obviously if NI gets smaller so will NI/EBT (negatively affecting the ROE from an extended DuPont). NI/EBT is the ratio of post-tax income to pre-tax income - it is somewhat oddly referred to as the tax burden. This is counter-intuitive, since the “burden” in ordinary language would be the ratio of tax to EBT (or (NI-EBT)/EBT). Just guessing, but could this be the problem - that a smaller “tax burden” actually means more tax to pay proportionally?
In the DuPont equation, if you’re salvaging less return, due to a smaller “tax burden”(!), your ROE will decline accordingly. |
|