|
LOS h: Judge the validity of using manager universes as benchmarks.
Q1. Which of the following best characterizes manager universes as a benchmark? Manager universes:
A) are not a valid benchmark because they are not investable.
B) are a valid benchmark because they are measurable.
C) are not a valid benchmark because they are not measurable.
Q2. Fund Sponsors often use the median account in a particular universe of account returns as an appropriate benchmark. This form of benchmark has a number of drawbacks. Which of the following is NOT a drawback that would be associated with using the median account as a benchmark?
A) It is virtually impossible to identify the median manager in advance.
B) As the median manager is unknown, the measure is ambiguous.
C) It is not measurable as its value cannot be determined on a reasonably frequent basis.
Q3. Which of the following best describes the impact of survivorship bias on using manager universes as benchmarks?
A) As consistently underperforming funds are terminated by the fund sponsors, the surviving funds shrink in number such that in a fairly short period of time the number of funds is too small to allow meaningful benchmarking.
B) Fund sponsors are reluctant to terminate underperforming funds, these accounts survive in the benchmark, and the median will be biased downwards.
C) Fund sponsors will terminate underperforming managers, underperforming accounts will not survive, and the median will be biased upwards. | 
发表于 2009-4-10 13:44
| 
