Reading 44: Market-Based Valuation: Price and Enterprise Val following, 2011, possible, valuation, including

土豆妮

Session 12: Equity Investments: Valuation Models
Reading 44: Market-Based Valuation: Price and Enterprise Value Multiples

LOS c: Discuss rationales for and possible drawbacks to using price multiples (including P/E, P/B, P/S, P/CF) and dividend yield in valuation.

 

 

Which of the following is a disadvantage of using price-to-sales (P/S) multiples in stock valuations?

A) The use of P/S multiples can miss problems associated with cost control.

B) It is difficult to capture the effects of changes in pricing policies using P/S ratios.

C) P/S multiples are more volatile than price-to-earnings (P/E) multiples.

---

 

Due to the stability of using sales relative to earnings in the P/S multiple, an analyst may miss problems of troubled firms concerning its cost control. P/S multiples are actually less volatile than P/E ratios, which is an advantage in using the P/S multiple. Also, P/S ratios provide a useful framework for evaluating effects of pricing changes on firm value.

[此贴子已经被作者于2011-3-21 11:31:35编辑过]

土豆妮

Which of the following is a disadvantage of using the price-to-book value (PBV) ratio?

A) Book values are affected by accounting standards, which may vary across firms and countries.

B) Book value may not mean much for manufacturing firms with significant fixed costs.

C) Firms with negative earnings cannot be evaluated with the PBV ratios.

---

The disadvantages of using PBV ratios are:

1. Book values are affected by accounting standards, which may vary across firms and countries.
2. Book value may not mean much for service firms without significant fixed costs.
3. Book value of equity can be made negative by a series of negative earnings, which limits the usefulness of the variable.

土豆妮

Which of the following is NOT an advantage of using price-to-book value (PBV) multiples in stock valuation?

A) Book value is often positive, even when earnings are negative.

B) PBV ratios can be compared across similar firms if accounting standards are consistent.

C) Book values are very meaningful for firms in service industries.

---

Book values are NOT very meaningful for firms in service industries.

土豆妮

An argument against using the price-to-sales (P/S) valuation approach is that:

A) P/S ratios do not express differences in cost structures across companies.

B) P/S ratios are not as volatile as price-to-earnings (P/E) multiples.

C) sales figures are not as easy to manipulate or distort as earnings per share (EPS) and book value.

---

P/S ratios do not express differences in cost structures across companies. Both remaining responses are advantages of the P/S ratios, not disadvantages.

土豆妮

One disadvantage of using the price/sales (P/S) multiple for stock valuation is that:

A) profit margins are not consistent across firms within an industry.

B) P/S multiple does not provide a framework to evaluate the effects of corporate policy decisions and price changes.

C) sales are relatively stable and might not change even though earnings and value might change significantly.

---

The stability of sales (relative to earnings and book value) can be a disadvantage. For example, revenues may remain stable but earnings and book values can drop significantly due to a sharp increase in expenses.

土豆妮

Barnes is contemplating the use of a price/earnings ratio to value a start-up medical technology firm. Which of the following is the most compelling reason not to use the P/E ratio?

A) P/E ratios for medical-technology firms with different specialties are not comparable.

B) Earnings per share are not a good determinant of investment value for medical-technology companies.

C) The company is likely to be unprofitable.

---

Earnings are the chief determinant of value for most companies, including med-tech. P/E is the most common valuation method and the best known by lay investors. Comparability of P/E ratios across industries is always problematic, but not as much so for within the med-tech industry. A start-up company is very likely to have negative earnings, which renders the P/E ratio useless. (Study Session 12, LOS 44.c)

---

Based on their responses to Powell, which of the analysts is most likely concerned about earnings volatility?

A) Lincoln.

B) Bosley.

C) Barnes.

---

Book value tends to be more stable than earnings. Therefore, Lincoln’s favorite valuation tool, the P/B ratio, is less volatile than the P/E. The P/S ratio tends to be less volatile than the P/E as well, but Bosley’s other favorite, earnings yield, is just as volatile. The method preferred by Barnes is likely to be more volatile than the P/B ratio. (Study Session 12, LOS 44.c)

---

Based on their responses to Powell, which of the analysts has proposed a method that has the best chance to work for determining the relative value start-up companies?

A) Marks.

B) Bosley.

C) Lincoln.

---

Start-up companies tend to be unprofitable, and also often have negative free cash flow. Book value has some predictive power for such companies, but this is also often negative for new and unprofitable companies. The price/sales ratio, one of Bosley’s favorites, is the only metric that will work even if earnings, cash flows, and book value are negative. (Study Session 12, LOS 44.c)

---

Barnes would be least likely to use EV/EBITDA ratio, rather than the P/E ratio, when analyzing a company that:

A) reports a lot of depreciation expense.

B) has a different capital structure than most of its peers.

C) pays a dividend, and is likely to deliver little earnings growth.

---

For companies that report a lot of depreciation expense or must be compared to companies with different levels of financial leverage, the EV/EBITDA ratio may be more useful than the P/E. For companies that pay a dividend and have little profit growth, both should work fine. Given Barnes’ stated preference for the P/E ratio, she is least likely to use the EV/EBITDA ratio with the dividend-paying firm. (Study Session 12, LOS 44.c)

---

Barnes is considering the four methods previously described to analyze the small-cap stocks provided to her by Powell. For which method does Barnes provide the weakest justification?

A) The price/sales ratio.

B) The PEG ratio.

C) The mean P/E of S& 500 companies.

---

No valuation method will work dependably across all types of stocks. The four Barnes proposed are probably as good as any. But the PEG ratio does not correct for risk – it works as a comparison tool only if the companies have similar expected risks and returns. The other justifications are reasonable. (Study Session 12, LOS 44.c)

土豆妮

An argument for using the price-to-earnings (P/E) valuation approach is that:

A) research shows that P/E differences are significantly related to long-run average stock returns.

B) earnings volatility facilitates interpretation.

C) earnings can be negative.

---

Research shows that P/E differences are significantly related to long-run average stock returns. Both remaining factors reduce the usefulness of the P/E approach.

土豆妮

An argument for using the price-to-earnings (P/E) valuation approach is that:

A) earnings can be negative.

B) management discretion increases the reliability of the ratio.

C) earnings power is the primary determinant of investment value.

---

Earnings power is the primary determinant of investment value. Both remaining factors reduce the usefulness of the P/E approach.

土豆妮

A firm is better valued using the discounted cash flow approach than the P/E multiples approach when:

A) expected growth rate is very high.

B) dividend payout is low.

C) earnings per share are negative.

---

P/E multiples are not meaningful when the earnings per share are negative. While this problem can be partially offset by using normalized or average earnings per share, the problem cannot be eliminated.

土豆妮

An argument against using the price-to-earnings (P/E) valuation approach is that:

A) earnings can be negative.

B) research shows that P/E differences are significantly related to long-run average stock returns.

C) earnings power is the primary determinant of investment value.

---

Negative earnings render the P/E ratio useless. Both remaining factors increase the usefulness of the P/E approach.