- UID
- 223447
- 帖子
- 344
- 主题
- 22
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2016-4-18
|
7#
发表于 2011-7-13 17:02
| 只看该作者
Woot the old "Schwesser vs. CFAI" argument. Good thing about this one is that we can have it again, and again, and again.
I've used both - Used Schwesser the 1st time (fail), CFAI 2nd time (we'll see). Here are some "facts":
-Schwesser and CFAI both contain what you're supposed to learn.
-Schwesser material (in aggregate) is about 75% as thick as CFAI.
-CFAI will have - somewhere in the reading - the exact answer to every single question that's on the test.
-Schwesser will have - somewhere in the reading - the concept you need to get the test answer right, but you'll have to think about it and figure out what "the trick" is that CFAI readers probably already caught.
Here's some more that I think is valid:
With Schwesser, you think you're saving time but you aren't (especially if you fail). You can do 250 hours with Schwesser and 250 hours with CFAI - different approaches, but in the end it's the "pound of feathers vs. pound of bricks" question. Schwesser is, hands down, the "pound of feathers" everybody who searches for that "time saving method" is looking for. It's still a pound, people. You have to learn it regardless. |
|