The standard error of estimate for Smith’s regression is closest to:
The formula for the Standard Error of the Estimate (SEE) is:
The SEE equals the standard deviation of the regression residuals. A low SEE implies a high R2. (Study Session 3, LOS 12.f)
Is Smith correct or incorrect regarding Concerns 1 and 2?
A) |
Only correct on one concern and incorrect on the other. | |
B) |
Correct on both Concerns. | |
C) |
Incorrect on both Concerns. | |
Smith’s Concern 1 is incorrect. Heteroskedasticity is a violation of a regression assumption, and refers to regression error variance that is not constant over all observations in the regression. Conditional heteroskedasticity is a case in which the error variance is related to the magnitudes of the independent variables (the error variance is “conditional” on the independent variables). The consequence of conditional heteroskedasticity is that the standard errors will be too low, which, in turn, causes the t-statistics to be too high. Smith’s Concern 2 also is not correct. Multicollinearity refers to independent variables that are correlated with each other. Multicollinearity causes standard errors for the regression coefficients to be too high, which, in turn, causes the t-statistics to be too low. However, contrary to Smith’s concern, multicollinearity has no effect on the F-statistic. (Study Session 3, LOS 12.i)
The most recent change in foreclosure share was +1 percent. Smith decides to base her analysis on the data and methods provided in Exhibits 4 and 5, and determines that the two-step ahead forecast for the change in foreclosure share (in percent) is 0.125, and that the mean reverting value for the change in foreclosure share (in percent) is 0.071. Is Smith correct?
A) |
Smith is correct on the two-step ahead forecast for change in foreclosure share only. | |
B) |
Smith is correct on the mean-reverting level for forecast of change in foreclosure share only. | |
C) |
Smith is correct on both the forecast and the mean reverting level. | |
Forecasts are derived by substituting the appropriate value for the period t-1 lagged value.
So, the one-step ahead forecast equals 0.30%. The two-step ahead (%) forecast is derived by substituting 0.30 into the equation.
ΔForeclosure Sharet+1 = 0.05 + 0.25(0.30) = 0.125
Therefore, the two-step ahead forecast equals 0.125%.
(Study Session 3, LOS 13.d)
Assume for this question that Smith finds that the foreclosure share series has a unit root. Under these conditions, she can most reliably regress foreclosure share against the change in interest rates (ΔINT) if:
A) |
ΔINT does not have unit root. | |
B) |
ΔINT has unit root and is not cointegrated with foreclosure share. | |
C) |
ΔINT has unit root and is cointegrated with foreclosure share. | |
The error terms in the regressions for choices A, B, and C will be nonstationary. Therefore, some of the regression assumptions will be violated and the regression results are unreliable. If, however, both series are nonstationary (which will happen if each has unit root), but cointegrated, then the error term will be covariance stationary and the regression results are reliable. (Study Session 3, LOS 13.k)
|