- UID
- 218214
- 帖子
- 418
- 主题
- 85
- 注册时间
- 2011-5-26
- 最后登录
- 2012-9-12
|
12#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:22
| 只看该作者
I think some of the issue lies in that there are three kinds of "behavioral finance biases": biases, behavioral sources of chronic market inefficiency, and psychological traps of forecasting.
Apparently, according to Schweser (in the "for the exam" box on p. 83 of the Capital Markets Expectations Chapter), if two traps/sources/biases are effectively the same thing and are explained well, the grader will give you full credit.
For instance, Schweser says that the prudence trap can be explained in terms of regret minimization, so long as you articulate your reasoning well. Now, to be safe, what I'd do is list the behavioral characteristic in the context of the question - e.g. if the problem is talking about forecasting, go with the traps.
Specifically for this questions, I think the difference between the status quo bias and anchoring bias is very clear. Status quo bias is not bothering to analyze new information and simply go with your existing forecast because it is easier and counteracts the fear of regret. Anchoring is during the decision making process, you weight information you get first more than information you get later. |
|