1215

Scott Marsh is a research analyst for a brokerage firm following the computer industry. Joe Perry is Marsh's former college roommate and is the head of technology for Mercury, a large software company. Perry informs Marsh on Tuesday that in two days the company will be making an official announcement that its release of its newest version of its software will be moved up one month, from October 1 to September 1. The announcement will be surprising to the industry and will likely be met with skepticism because the company has had trouble meeting release dates in the past. Perry assures Marsh that he is certain that they will meet the September 1 date. Marsh considers Perry to be very honest and highly competent. Marsh should:

A) immediately put out a report recommending the stock, but waiting until the official announcement to state his reasons.

B) produce his research report in two days based solely on the official announcement, not taking into consideration the information from Perry.

C) wait until the public announcement is made, then release a report explaining that he believes the company will make the release date, disclosing that one of the reasons for his opinion is Perry is a friend of his.

---

The research report cannot be released until the official announcement is made, otherwise he will be violating the Standard on prohibition against the use of material nonpublic information. Once it is made public, Marsh can disclose the nature of the conversation without violating that Standard because the information will now be public. However, he should disclose the relationship with Perry or he will be violating the Standard on communications with clients and prospective clients.

1215

While having a conversation with a prospective client, John Henry states that his performance across all of his past clients over the past five years was over 20%, which was 200 basis points higher than his benchmark. He tells the client that while the benchmark may rise or fall over time, his excess performance will remain consistent. Henry violated the Standards of Professional Conduct because:

A) he cannot discuss prospective future performance in any manner.

B) the statement of excess performance is misleading with respect to its certainty.

C) he cannot discuss performance without clearly stating that the composite does not conform to GIPS.

---

Guaranteeing performance on investments that are inherently volatile is misleading to clients.

1215

Jennifer Gates is an individual portfolio manager who only uses mutual funds for her clients; she has therefore never created a portfolio of stocks. She enters an Internet chat room on investments and starts answering questions about investments. She states in the chat room that she has a CFA designation. One woman in particular is interested and questions her about the viability of creating her own stock portfolio. Gates feels that this would be a mistake because she only has $150,000 to invest, and states, "I have experience creating stock portfolios, and it does not make sense to do so with only $150,000." The woman she has chatted with sends her an e-mail and eventually becomes a client of hers. Gates has:

A) violated the Standards by soliciting business over the Internet.

B) not violated the Standards.

C) violated the Standards by misrepresenting her experience.

---

One cannot misrepresent their experience, even over the Internet.

1215

Ned Brenan manages two dozen pension accounts, one of which earned over 25% during the past two years. Brenan tells prospective clients that based on past experience they can expect a 25% return on their funds. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

A) Brenan has violated Standard of Professional Conduct III(D), Performance Presentation, but Brenan has not violated Standard I(C), Misrepresentation.

B) Brenan has violated both Standard of Professional Conduct III(D), Performance Presentation, and Standard I(C), Misrepresentation.

C) Brenan has not violated Standard of Professional Conduct III(D), Performance Presentation, but Brenan has violated Standard I(C), Misrepresentation.

---

Brenan violated Standard of Professional Conduct III(D) by using only one portfolio’s results to create a false impression of all the portfolios, and Brenan violated Standard of Professional Conduct I(C) by creating the impression that a certain return was assured (he should have used the words “might” or “could” instead of “can”).

1215

While attending his wife’s office party, Donald North, CFA, overhears two top executives from Parker Industries discussing that the company’s Board of Directors just approved to omit its cash dividend due to unexpected losses during the quarter. Parker has paid a quarterly dividend for the past ten years. The next day, North calls his broker and instructs her to sell short Parker’s common stock.

While in a coffee shop, Diane South, CFA, overhears two top executives from Ryland Products say that their company is about to be acquired by another company for a substantial premium over the market price. The next day, South calls her broker and instructs him to buy 500 shares of Ryland’s common stock.

Which of the following statements about whether North and South violated Standard II(A), Material Nonpublic Information, is CORRECT?

A) Both North and South violated Standard II(A).

B) North violated Standard II(A) but South did not violate Standard II(A).

C) Neither North nor South violated Standards II(A).

---

According to Standard II(A), a member or candidate must not act or cause others to act on material nonpublic information until that same information is made public. In both cases, the information was material nonpublic information; therefore, both North and South are in violation.

1215

Maggie McCarthy is an individual investment advisor who uses mutual funds for her clients. She typically chooses from a list of 40 funds that she has thoroughly researched. The Figgs, a married couple that are a client, asked her to consider the Boilermaker fund for their portfolio. McCarthy had not previously considered the fund because when she first conducted her research three years ago, Boilermaker was too small to be considered. However, the fund has now grown in value, and after doing thorough research on Boilermaker, she found the fund was by far the most outstanding large company value fund in her list of funds. She puts the fund in the Figgs' portfolio, and in all new clients portfolios, but not in any of her other clients' portfolios. Her reasoning is that her existing clients were comfortable with their current holdings, and she did not want to risk disturbing their comfort. Has McCarthy violated any Standards? McCarthy has:

A) violated the Standards by not dealing fairly with clients.

B) violated the Standards by not having a reasonable and adequate basis for making the recommendation.

C) not violated the Standards.

---

The fund should have been considered for the existing clients' portfolios. There may have been reasons not to add the fund to their portfolios, such as tax consequences or a lack of suitability, but disturbing their comfort is not sufficient.

1215

Scott LaRue is a portfolio manager for Washington Advisors. Washington has developed a proprietary model that has been thoroughly researched and is known throughout the industry as the Washington model. The model is purely quantitative and screens stocks into buy, hold, and sell categories. The basic philosophy of the model is thoroughly explained to clients. The director of research frequently alters the model based on rigorous research—an aspect that is well explained to clients, although the specific alterations are not continually disclosed. Portfolio managers then make specific sector and security holding decisions, purchasing only securities that are indicated as "buys" by the model. La Rue feels the model would be improved by adding some factors but he has not fully tested this new version of the model. LaRue discloses his model to his own clients but not to his supervisor. LaRue is:

A) violating the Standards by not considering the appropriateness of the recommendations to clients.

B) not violating the Standards.

C) violating the Standards by not having a reasonable and adequate basis for his investment recommendation.

---

The ad hoc model is not part of the formal research process and does not formulate an adequate basis for a recommendation.

1215

A company has a defined benefit plan that is currently under-funded. The plan sponsor has instructed the portfolio manager of the plan to invest more aggressively to bring the funding level up to an adequate amount. Which of the following statements best describes the course of action the portfolio manager should take? The portfolio manager should:

A) not invest more aggressively since this may expose the plan to too much risk and may not be in the best interest of the plan's beneficiaries.

B) not invest more aggressively because this is not the method used to increase the funding level of a plan.

C) invest more aggressively because his fiduciary duties lie with the plan sponsor.

---

Standard III(A), Loyalty, Prudence, and Care, applies in this situation. According to this Standard, investment actions should be carried out for the sole benefit of the client and in a manner the manager believes to be in the best interest of the client. Here, the client is the plan beneficiaries, not the manager or the entity that hired the manager.

1215

Nancy Westfall is an individual investment advisor who uses mutual funds for her clients. She typically chooses funds from a list of 40 funds that she has thoroughly researched. The Craigs, a married couple that is a client, asked her to consider the Eligis fund for their portfolio. Westfall had not previously considered the fund because when she first conducted her research three years ago, Eligis was too small to be considered. However, the fund has now grown in value, and after doing thorough research on the fund, she finds the fund has suitable characteristics to be included in her acceptable list of funds. She puts the fund in the Craigs' portfolio but not in any of her other clients' portfolios. The fund ends up being the poorest performing fund in the Craigs' portfolio. Has Westfall violated any Standards? Westfall has:

A) not violated the Standards.

B) violated the Standards by not dealing fairly with clients.

C) violated the Standards by not having a reasonable and adequate basis for making the recommendation.

---

Because Westfall performed the same degree of research as she did for the other funds on her list, she provided a reasonable and adequate basis for her recommendation. There is not enough information given about the Eligis fund and how it fits in with the other funds on Westfall's list to determine whether or not the standard on Fair Dealing was broken. It was the Craigs who wanted the Eligis fund and Westfall found it to be acceptable for them and thus added it to her list of acceptable funds. If the Eligis fund was found to possess unique characteristics that were not found in any of the other funds on Westfall's list and the Eligis fund was suitable for some of Westfall's other clients and Westfall hadn't added it to their portfolios after their periodic review then a violation of fair dealing would have occurred.

1215

Denise Weaver is a portfolio manager who manages a mutual fund and has pension clients. When Weaver receives a proxy for stock in the mutual fund, she gives it to Susan Griffith, her administrative assistant, to complete. When the proxy is for a stock owned in a pension plan, she asks Griffith to send the proxy on to the sponsor of the pension fund. Weaver has:

A) violated the Standards by her policy on mutual fund proxies, but not her policy on pension fund proxies.

B) violated the Standards by her policy on mutual fund and pension fund proxies.

C) not violated the Standards.

---

Proxies should be taken seriously, and although it is likely that Griffith can understand some of the issues, it is likely that she is not capable of making responsible decisions on all potential proxy issues. Proxies for a pension plan should be voted in the best interests of the beneficiaries, not the plan sponsor. The sponsor's interests will not always be the same as the beneficiary's interest.