sheila18

QUOTE:

以下是引用chalanda在2011-6-7 2:40:00的发言：

I have not graduated yet.

oh, I thought I found a colleage

宾客

呵呵。这才是高手应该有的形象。

[此贴子已经被作者于2011-6-7 2:46:54编辑过]

chalanda

..........

brightcool

QUOTE:

以下是引用chalanda在2011-6-7 2:37:00的发言：

Well. Not a lot of MIT phds take CFA. CFA helps little in find a job in quantitative/algorithmic/high-frequency trading

[此贴子已经被作者于2011-6-7 2:41:40编辑过]

sure , if you are a finance PHD , no need to take CFA , it is too basic

brightcool

天气好

[此贴子已经被作者于2011-6-7 3:02:45编辑过]

best_tu

QUOTE:

以下是引用chalanda在2011-6-7 2:18:00的发言：

I am MIT engineering phd. I learned finance by getting A+ in almost all the classes in MIT master of finance curriculum.

I am sorry, but that makes more sense. It is tough to shift from one area to a totally different one. I found some of your ideas are not that practical. No offense.

chalanda

..........

sheila18

QUOTE:

以下是引用chalanda在2011-6-7 2:54:00的发言：

Boston is a GREAT place! A lot of good funds like state street, GMO...

I am actually not in Boston, I mean industry colleage...I am working in a fund in Denver Colorado.

best_tu

QUOTE:

以下是引用chalanda在2011-6-7 3:03:00的发言：

Yeap, I don't know a single case that a finance PHD takes CFA.

But I know a lot of finance phd are taking exams if they are in industry. CFA designation means a lot more than Phd when you talk to clients.

sheila18

QUOTE:

以下是引用best_tu在2011-6-7 3:08:00的发言：

But I know a lot of finance phd are taking exams if they are in industry. CFA designation means a lot more than Phd when you talk to clients.

finance PHDs usually not facing clients, thay are facing students~