- UID
- 223334
- 帖子
- 263
- 主题
- 43
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2013-9-9
|
67#
发表于 2012-3-28 16:33
| 只看该作者
Selected financial data from Krandall, Inc.’s balance sheet for the year ended December 31 was as follows (in $):
Cash | $1,100,000 |
Accounts Payable | $400,000 |
Accounts Receivable | 300,000 |
Deferred Tax Liability | 700,000 |
Inventory | 2,400,000 |
Long-term Debt | 8,200,000 |
Property, Plant & Eq. | 8,000,000 |
Common Stock | 1,000,000 |
Total Assets | 11,800,000 |
Retained Earnings | 1,500,000 |
LIFO Reserve at Jan. 1 | 600,000 |
Total Liabilities & Equity | 11,800,000 |
LIFO Reserve at Dec. 31 | 900,000 |
|
|
Krandall uses the last in, first out (LIFO) inventory cost flow assumption. The tax rate is 40%. If Krandall used first in, first out (FIFO) instead of LIFO and paid any additional tax due, its assets-to-equity ratio would be closest to:
With FIFO instead of LIFO:- Inventory would be higher by $900,000, the amount of the ending LIFO reserve.
- Cumulative pretax income would also be higher by $900,000, so taxes paid would be higher by 0.40($900,000) = $360,000. Therefore cash would be lower by $360,000.
- Cumulative retained earnings would be higher by (1 − 0.40)($900,000) = $540,000.
So assets under FIFO would be $11,800,000 + $900,000 - $360,000 = $12,340,000 and equity would be $1,000,000 + $1,500,000 + $540,000 = $3,040,000. The assets-to-equity ratio would be $12,340,000 / $3,040,000 = 4.06. |
|