首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
pawn

Rank: 2

UID
222256 
帖子
271 
主题
71 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-6-29 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-13 15:55 | 只看该作者

Absolute or % for corridor widths?

kidding
Just kidding, Paraguay.
收藏 分享

bkballa

UID
222297 
帖子
431 
主题
13 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-1-9 
2#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:55 | 只看该作者
15th!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Wednesday, June 1, 2011 at 02:56PM by Paraguay.

TOP

Windjammer

Rank: 2

UID
222305 
帖子
379 
主题
21 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-12-5 
3#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:55 | 只看该作者
And for the record, the answer is obviously absolute and the CFAi is wrong and everyone who took Sample in the last 2 weeks is the first guy to figure it out.

TOP

justin88

Rank: 2

UID
222316 
帖子
403 
主题
7 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-8-2 
4#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:55 | 只看该作者
Paraguay Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And for the record, the answer is obviously
> absolute and the CFAi is wrong and everyone who
> took Sample in the last 2 weeks is the first guy
> to figure it out.

Can you advise what is wrong with CFAi ?

TOP

ohai

Rank: 2

UID
222303 
帖子
400 
主题
8 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-11-28 
5#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:55 | 只看该作者
I think this must be some sort of inside joke. Corridors are used in PERCENTAGE of Portfolio rebalancing. So you would use percentage widths for your corridors. Hence, nothing wrong with CFAI (at least with respect to this question).



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Thursday, June 2, 2011 at 02:08PM by LobsterBoy.

TOP

infinitybenzo

Rank: 2

UID
222323 
帖子
377 
主题
10 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-2-5 
6#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:55 | 只看该作者
Wait did you guys take the mock where it said to rebalance the whole portfolio because international equity was out of the corridor limits?

I think it had a corridor limit of +/- 10% and international equity was at 40% and went to 45 and it said to rebalance.

Wouldn't it have to go to 50%?


I was confused by this.

TOP

返回列表