上一主题:Hans Inger
下一主题:money-weighted rate of return
返回列表 发帖

LIFO Reserve Qbank question

Can someone explain how they are using 900,000 LIFO reserve to calculate an increase in income? I understand how this will increase assets (inventory) but I do not see the correlation with increased income.



Selected financial data from Krandall, Inc.’s balance sheet for the year ended December 31 was as follows (in $):

Cash
$1,100,000
Accounts Receivable
300,000
Inventory
2,400,000
Property, Plant & Eq.
8,000,000
Common Stock
1,000,000
Total Assets
11,800,000

LIFO Reserve at Jan. 1
600,000
LIFO Reserve at Dec. 31
900,000


Accounts Payable
$400,000
Deferred Tax Liability
700,000
Long-term Debt
8,200,000
Retained Earnings
1,500,000
Total Liabilities & Equity
11,800,000


Krandall uses the last in, first out (LIFO) inventory cost flow assumption. The tax rate is 40%. If Krandall used first in, first out (FIFO) instead of LIFO and paid any additional tax due, its assets-to-equity ratio would be closest to:

A) 4.06

B) 3.73

C) 4.18


Your answer: C was incorrect. The correct answer was A) 4.06


With FIFO instead of LIFO:

Inventory would be higher by $900,000, the amount of the ending LIFO reserve.
Cumulative pretax income would also be higher by $900,000, so taxes paid would be higher by 0.40($900,000) = $360,000. Therefore cash would be lower by $360,000.
Cumulative retained earnings would be higher by (1 − 0.40)($900,000) = $540,000.
So assets under FIFO would be $11,800,000 + $900,000 - $360,000 = $12,340,000 and equity would be $1,000,000 + $1,500,000 + $540,000 = $3,040,000. The assets-to-equity ratio would be $12,340,000 / $3,040,000 = 4.06.

LIFO or FIFO have an impact on both Inventory Figure (on the Balance sheet) and on the COGS (which has an Income statement impact).

CP

TOP

Lol... Today ended Qbank practice at this question will do it tomorrow and come back again

TOP

返回列表
上一主题:Hans Inger
下一主题:money-weighted rate of return