注册 登录
上一主题：Mock PM Examine - Corp Fin
下一主题：Qbank worth it?
返回列表 发帖
fishmarket

Rank: 2

UID
223390 
帖子
217 
主题
48 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2016-4-19 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2013-4-12 22:52 | 只看该作者

Schweser Book 4 Page 136 Self Test question 2

136, 300, principal, something, question
Ok, what am I doing wrong. Shouldn’t the unhedged dollar return and the hedge return come back relatively close to the return in local
I’m seeing a
local return of 6.7 (320,000-300,000/300,000)
US Return of 16.4 (384,000-330,000/330,000)
Return on contract -7.3 -(1.23-1.15*300,000/330,000)
Hedged return of 16.4 - 7.3 = 9.1 (C)
Why doesn’t it come back to 6.7 (or very close) considering the principal’s been hedged?
Sorry if I missed something stupid. I’ve been looking at this for 45 minutes. I can’t waste anymore time on one problem.
Thanks in advance.

 

相关主题：

. Mock 30, Question 114

. Fiscal multiplier question

. Finquiz QBank

. Question about exam location(NYC).

. Reading 27: Excess Earnings Method

收藏 分享

Iginla2011

Rank: 2

UID
222302 
帖子
408 
主题
11 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-6-23 
2#
发表于 2013-4-12 22:52 | 只看该作者
Probably because the 6.7% local return doesn’t take into account the currency changes? Local return is just the change in the values. Its when you want to look at it from a domestic viewpoint, you take the currency changes.

TOP

jcfa2011

Rank: 1

UID
223391 
帖子
213 
主题
35 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
3#
发表于 2013-4-12 22:52 | 只看该作者
I guess the reason is the euro appreciated so much.
look at unhedged return, it is 16.4% much higher than the 9.1%

TOP

ishfaque

Rank: 2

UID
223317 
帖子
277 
主题
141 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2016-4-19 
4#
发表于 2013-4-12 22:52 | 只看该作者
Yeah, must be. It was a big move. I was concerned as the other examples the hedge at least got you pretty close so it was a good check to make sure you didn’t screw up a calc.

TOP

返回列表
上一主题：Mock PM Examine - Corp Fin
下一主题：Qbank worth it?