data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ce67/2ce67c8922229037a704a253d64784b05efcddbc" alt="Rank: 2"
- UID
- 223404
- 帖子
- 321
- 主题
- 23
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2014-7-31
|
3#
发表于 2011-7-13 13:20
| 只看该作者
Yes, the formula is the same except under U.S.GAAP the 'Amortisation of transition (asset)/liability is to be added in exceptional cases, however I would rather omit this. And of course the actuarial assumptions can cause differences in the DB pension expense.
On p.209 of the FRA curriculum there is a useful summary table on this topic. |
|