- UID
- 223347
- 帖子
- 460
- 主题
- 48
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2013-8-23
|
13#
发表于 2011-10-2 19:26
| 只看该作者
It's ln changes, not ln levels (in case you didn't get that).
It took a long time for me to understand why to use one or the other. In my opinion, there are two reasons beyond what Mobius says.
First, if you use natural logs and then transfer it to arithmetic, then the arithmetic will never fall below 0 (this is important for indices that never will fall below 0). Alternately, it may also be important that as the index goes to 0, then the volatility might fall.
Second, when you're doing like a mean-variance optimization, then you need to do it on arithmetic returns. If the frequency of your data matches your time horizon, this isn't an issue. However, if you have a longer time horizon, then you need to project out data and its tricky to project out arithmetic returns. B/c of what Mobius says, you can just add up the log returns and convert to arithmetic (exp(X)-1 does the trick). You can't use the log returns in the optimization b/c log returns don't add up the way arithmetic returns do. |
|