- UID
- 223388
- 帖子
- 226
- 主题
- 41
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2014-7-3
|
BangBusDriver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Basically it's a barrier option with some sort of
> equity swap component fixed to it.
>
> Do you end up owing it if it goes below 40% level
> or stays above 60% level?
>
> Both trades are possible. In both the cases,
> they'll make money with fees, volatility,
> correlation and a swap with someone else if there
> is some sort of upfront payment which should be
> there. There must be a volatility criteria, this
> 1% they are paying is essentially coming from
> structuring volatility, and 1% is quite high, so
> there must be something to lever up the trade from.
your friend's end.
>
> From their side, they'll go long the volatility,
> and depending on what happens at barrier.. they'll
> go long/short the correlation as well, they might
> long/short deep in the money put/call depending on
> what happens at barrier, and they might as well
> initiate a total return swap with someone else,
> and finally they'll keep on constantly delta
> hedging.
@bangbusdriver. Thanks for your input.
Not quite clear as to how the equity swap would fit into this. Could you elaborate.
If the stock price stays above the barrier then you continue to get paid on a monthly basis. Once it reaches the barrier, the contract is null & void and you end up owning the shares at their lower values.
In terms of money, my friend is not borrowing money to invest. When you refer to structuring volatility, are you referring to the VIX or the vol/co relations of the stocks to each other/vix.
Oh, just one more thing, can this not be achieved by just selling front month puts and pocketing the premium which is higher than the barrier premiums.
Thanks for you help. very helpful and enlightening |
|