上一主题:Reading 43: Market-Based Valuation: Price Multiples- LOS
下一主题:Reading 43: Market-Based Valuation: Price Multiples- LOS
返回列表 发帖

Reading 43: Market-Based Valuation: Price Multiples- LOS

 

LOS e: Explain and justify the use of earnings yield (E/P).

Q1. A common pitfall in interpreting earnings yields in valuation is:

A)   look-ahead bias.

B)   using underlying earnings.

C)   using negative earnings.

 

Q2. A common justification for using earnings yields in valuation is that:

A)   earnings are more stable than dividends.

B)   negative earnings render P/E ratios meaningless and prices are never negative.

C)   earnings are usually greater than free cash flows.

 

Q3. The observation that negative price to earnings (P/E) ratios are meaningless and prices are never negative is used to justify which valuation approach?

A)   Earnings yield.

B)   Dividend discount model.

C)   Dividend yield.

[2009] Session 12 - Reading 43: Market-Based Valuation: Price Multiples- LOS

 

 

LOS e: Explain and justify the use of earnings yield (E/P). fficeffice" />

Q1. A common pitfall in interpreting earnings yields in valuation is:

A)   look-ahead bias.

B)   using underlying earnings.

C)   using negative earnings.

 Correct answer is A)

A common pitfall is look-ahead bias, wherein the analyst uses information that was not available to the investor when calculating the earnings yield.

 

Q2. A common justification for using earnings yields in valuation is that:

A)   earnings are more stable than dividends.

B)   negative earnings render P/E ratios meaningless and prices are never negative.

C)   earnings are usually greater than free cash flows.

Correct answer is B)

Negative earnings render P/E ratios meaningless. In such cases, it is common to use normalized earnings per share (EPS) and/or restate the ratio as the earnings yield or E/P because price is never negative. Price to earnings (P/E) ranking can then proceed as usual.

 

Q3. The observation that negative price to earnings (P/E) ratios are meaningless and prices are never negative is used to justify which valuation approach?

A)   Earnings yield.

B)   Dividend discount model.

C)   Dividend yield.

Correct answer is A)

The observation is used to justify the earnings yield approach. Negative P/E ratios are meaningless. In such cases, it is common to use normalized earnings per share (EPS) and/or restate the ratio as the earnings yield or E/P because price is never negative. Price to earnings (P/E) ranking can then proceed as usual.

 

TOP

1

TOP

哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

哈哈哈

TOP

回复:(wzaina)[2009] Session 12 - Reading 43: Ma...

nice

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用wzaina在2009-3-9 16:54:00的发言:
 

LOS e: Explain and justify the use of earnings yield (E/P).

Q1. A common pitfall in interpreting earnings yields in valuation is:

A)   look-ahead bias.

B)   using underlying earnings.

C)   using negative earnings.

 

Q2. A common justification for using earnings yields in valuation is that:

A)   earnings are more stable than dividends.

B)   negative earnings render P/E ratios meaningless and prices are never negative.

C)   earnings are usually greater than free cash flows.

 

Q3. The observation that negative price to earnings (P/E) ratios are meaningless and prices are never negative is used to justify which valuation approach?

A)   Earnings yield.

B)   Dividend discount model.

C)   Dividend yield.

http://ironegg.spaces.live.com

TOP

 thx

TOP

 what

TOP

ThK!

TOP

x

TOP

返回列表
上一主题:Reading 43: Market-Based Valuation: Price Multiples- LOS
下一主题:Reading 43: Market-Based Valuation: Price Multiples- LOS