When a parent company sells a subsidiary or a coherent group of assets with a stated reason to provide a near-term infusion of cash, which method for selling the assets is most likely?
| ||
| ||
|
Spin-offs involve the issuance of shares in the new firm, and do not generate cash for the parent company. Hence, this can be ruled out if the intent is an infusion of cash. An equity carve-out will generate cash for the parent when the public offering is completed, but this can take time. A divestiture is typically a sale to another firm for cash, and is likely to be completed much more quickly than a carve-out. Therefore, if the intent is to provide a near-term infusion of cash, a divestiture is most likely.
The usual distinction between a divestiture and a spin-off is that a divestiture:
| ||
| ||
|
Both actions involve the sale of a subsidiary or some coherent subset of the firm’s assets. In the case of a divestiture, the sale is usually for cash. In the case of a spin-off it involves the distribution of the new firm’s shares to the parent’s existing shareholders.
Which of the following statements regarding equity carve-outs is least accurate?
| ||
| ||
|
In an equity carve-out, the intent is to establish a new, independent firm. Therefore, the parent company usually does not maintain a controlling interest in the new firm.
The difference between a spin-off and a split-off is that in a spin-off:
| ||
| ||
|
In a spin-off, shares of the new firm are distributed to the parent’s existing shareholders on a pro-rata basis. In a split-off, the parent’s existing shareholders must surrender their shares in the parent to obtain shares in the new firm.
欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |