Board logo

标题: Fixed Income- Securitization [打印本页]

作者: bcp901    时间: 2011-7-11 19:06     标题: Fixed Income- Securitization

Can anybody give glance on RMBS and CMBS types of Stuctured products, i have confusion on Prepayment risk...... Do the RMBS carry high prepayment risk than CMBS. your input is really appreciate!!!!!!

Best regards,
Bhavesh Soni
作者: defour44    时间: 2011-7-11 19:06

Not sure what your book says but commercial mortgages are usually floating rate and residential mortgages are usually fixed rate. That means that interest rate fluctuations cause more prepayments for residential mortgages than commercial mortgages. But, in general, I would say that it's not a particularly relevant comparison because what really matters is the characteristics of the security you own, not the prepayments for this humongous class of securities.
作者: bolligerallstar    时间: 2011-7-11 19:06

and don't forget how they have tranched the risk, what tranche you are buying into, and how much the support tranches have already been impacted by prepayments and or defaults.
作者: zephyranalyst    时间: 2011-7-11 19:06

Also, CMBS are non-recourse loans and have various prepayment safe guards like defeasence and some others cant remember them off the top of my head.
作者: xilinx_altera    时间: 2011-7-11 19:06

Thanks JoeyDVivre, Andrew3032, cfakid
作者: mp3bu    时间: 2011-7-11 19:06

RMBS has higher prepayment risk than CMBS due to limited prepay penalties. Every time interest rates drop, prime homeowners generally refi. CMBS refi is generally very limited. CFAKid has it right.




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2