Just quick question, is it add value ? or doing Schweser prac exams better?作者: ll11 时间: 2011-7-11 19:31
Only issue is that I hav ebeen told this year's version has a lot of errors, but they have the errata on their website, I believe. Not taking that until next week, so I hadn't looked into it.作者: liangfeng 时间: 2011-7-11 19:31
Can you please post the link to the errata? Thanks.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Thursday, May 19, 2011 at 01:10PM by deriv108.作者: former 时间: 2011-7-11 19:31
Took it. Decent I guess. Lot of errors is right.作者: oneboy 时间: 2011-7-11 19:31
Does anyone have a link for the BSAS site where they show where the exam errors area??作者: mcmc 时间: 2011-7-11 19:31
BSAS is the the worst exam you can take imo.
I counted something like 8 to 10 errors in the q&a and explanations for the afternoon section alone. I would be embarrassed to have put the BSAS exam out to people the way it is.作者: Windjammer 时间: 2011-7-11 19:31
I absolutely agree with CFA canadian... It is a terrible test and an absolute waste of 50 bucks. If you have some extra cash so and buy the Schweser mock exam for 50 instead...作者: mik82 时间: 2011-7-11 19:31
For the 1st question in AM, can anyone explain why they didn't include the value of their residence in the investable base?
NO EXCUSES作者: NakedPuts00 时间: 2011-7-11 19:31
BTW, was anyone able to complete those crazy calculations required for 9A? Yeah, like I could do all that in 4 minutes...
