Board logo

标题: liability-mimicking portfolio [打印本页]

作者: Carson    时间: 2011-7-11 19:35     标题: liability-mimicking portfolio

EOC Volume 2 Page 464 #2 and #3.

I totally don't understand what the hell those are.

An explanation from A-to-Z please.....



thx.
作者: skycfa    时间: 2011-7-11 19:35

The components of a pension fund's liabilities can be categorized as inflation-adjusted or not inflation adjusted.

Real return bonds will best mimic the components of the liability that are inflation-adjusted.

Nominal bonds are best used to mimic the components of the liability that are not inflation adjusted.

It should explain which components are inflation-adjusted and not inflation-adjusted in the text...
作者: Zestt    时间: 2011-7-11 19:35

I guess it is terminology.
nominal has inflation built in, real is no inflation.

r nominal = r real + inflation.

Or (1+r nominal) = (1 + r real) * (1 + inflation)

CP
作者: ll11    时间: 2011-7-11 19:35

Nominal bonds are not adjusted for inflation. Real bonds are adjusted to provide a given real return as inflation changes. Question 2 explains that real bonds are inflation-indexed.

Can't tell if this conflicts with your explanation, CP.

Jin: For question 2, the case explains that current retiree benefits will continue have the COLA feature.
作者: infinitybenzo    时间: 2011-7-11 19:35

But why is the payment to retirees sensitive to CPI? Isn't the payment supposed to be fixed?

alaaq80 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi , in #2, bonds that are sensitive to CPI are
> mimicked by real growth bond (unexpected
> inflation) as well as future pmts.
> in #3, bonds and future pmts not sensitive to CPI
> or equity are considered as future payments to be
> mimicked by nominal bonds. Note the similarities
> between those liabilities and nominal bonds as
> both are considering expected inflation only.




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2