Board logo

标题: MWRR [打印本页]

作者: AnalystForum    时间: 2011-7-11 19:36     标题: MWRR

Schweser implies that we don't need to learn the calculation of MWRR as it is very less likely to be tested (because TWRR is a recommended method under GIPS). Do you guys agree? Of course, MWRR will be tested from the comparison standpoint with TWRR.
作者: IAmNeil    时间: 2011-7-11 19:36

schweser is weird ... whereevr it says the calculation isnt as important, i have seen many of those stuff tested in schweser practice volume 1 and 2.
作者: ohai    时间: 2011-7-11 19:36

Yeah just run it through the calculator using the CF function and computer the IRR and you will be fine as long as the periods are equal.




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2