标题: SLOW DOWN [打印本页] 作者: vagabond 时间: 2011-7-11 19:47 标题: SLOW DOWN
I guess I'm just preaching to myself on this but READ THE QUESTION.
Specifically the "LEAST LIKELY" question just smashed me in the face. I usually read slow and underline what they are asking (least likely / most likely / true / false, etc). When you get these types of questions wrong, its a double whammy cuz not only did you get the question wrong, but you must have eliminated 1 of the 2 correct answers. TYPE 1 ERROR. ARGGGGG. FU.
Given i got the question wrong, what is the conditional prob that I got it wrong cuz I didnt read the question? Prob 15-20%. the remaining 80-85% i just plain F'd up.
Ever wanna leave finance and just become a famous movie star or be John Stewart where you play out of context video clips, fast cut away, make a funny face, cue audience laugh, curse word, fast paced diatribe, cue audience cheer. Rinse. Repeat.
Sorry for the nonsense taking up space on the site. Wheels officially have come off.作者: disiz64 时间: 2011-7-11 19:47
>
> Ever wanna leave finance and just become a famous
> movie star or be John Stewart where you play out
> of context video clips, fast cut away, make a
> funny face, cue audience laugh, curse word, fast
> paced diatribe, cue audience cheer. Rinse. Repeat.
>
> Sorry for the nonsense taking up space on the
> site. Wheels officially have come off.
LOL! I am kinda thinking on the same lines these days...inspiring to be a movie director actually...all nonsense fantasies lol作者: johnnyBuz 时间: 2011-7-11 19:47
Yes, I had this problem about a week back by I think I addressed it....with the exception of some quant problems, I just jump right to the definition statement and skim the numbers.....gotta get into a better habit.....will I.....not likely, but I should, and that has to count for something.
