标题: Too much info or not enough? [打印本页] 作者: Wendy01 时间: 2011-7-13 15:18 标题: Too much info or not enough?
On a pension company question that I came across, it says list of the company has average, above average or below average risk tolerance and state 4 reasons. Would it be appropriate to just list out: high debt ratio and low profitability, high retired to active lives, Company's plan is currently underfunded or is it more appropriate to explain further? For instance, Company is unprofitable which would make it more difficult for the company to fund future pension liabilities? Or is that self-implied?作者: dyga 时间: 2011-7-13 15:18
I have to figure it is implied.作者: mp3bu 时间: 2011-7-13 15:18
You are ok being concise作者: Chuckrox 时间: 2011-7-13 15:18
It is implied. Dont need to write a lecture on the reasons.作者: mcmc 时间: 2011-7-13 15:18
Just got down watching Stalla lectures. Said you should add a little more. Nothing crazy but if it says "high debt ratio" you should add the implication. i.e., more difficult for the company to fund or maintain surplus作者: thommo77 时间: 2011-7-13 15:18
Look at how many minutes it is too - more minutes, more sentences! Explaining your reason may make the diff between 2/3 or 3/3
