Board logo

标题: CMA还是ACCA？ [打印本页]
作者: freshman    时间: 2006-8-5 22:16     标题: CMA还是ACCA？

想考个国际证书，本来对ACCA蛮有兴趣，但是最近看到还有个美国的CMA，好象看起来比ACCA容易点，科目也少很多，考起来会省很多时间啊！因为年纪也不小了，所以想速战速决。请大家帮忙出出主意。本人目前没有专业会计经验，希望以后向融资、投资、顾问方面发展。
作者: 13140000    时间: 2006-8-16 10:31

若是移民英联邦、欧盟、新加坡，应选ACCA。

作者: kinginsh    时间: 2006-8-28 10:52

美国的 AICPA 和 CMA 都只考4门。

需要提醒的是，如果你没有财务工作经验，即使通过全部考试也是拿不到证书的。

作者: wenquxinzw    时间: 2006-9-8 17:25

accaofcourse[em07]
作者: kinginsh    时间: 2006-9-12 08:56

Why ACCA of course?

Is it because ACCA has far more parts (14) to take than CMA (4)? Please bear in mind that US-based companies in China are predominant in terms of quantity and total investment.  Unfortunately, most CFOs from their mother companies in US don't recognize the certificates outside US, part of the reason is that US GAAP is different from IFRS, although they both will be harmonized some day in the future.

I have no intention to downplay ACCA because I'm proceeding to ACCA. In the meantime, I'm a CMA. 

作者: kinginsh    时间: 2006-9-12 09:08

By the way, if your career target is to work in investment banking and financing areas, I strongly recommend CFA.
作者: woaiyugege    时间: 2006-10-2 21:21

agree with ls.





欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2