标题: For retakers: Did they test you for the three ethics case st [打印本页] 作者: ogoluwa 时间: 2013-3-31 12:46 标题: For retakers: Did they test you for the three ethics case st
For retakers: Did they test you for the three ethics case studies last year?作者: AndyNZ 时间: 2013-3-31 12:46
doesn’t it says that ethics weight is 10% (NO RANGE for this)?
NO作者: busterbluth 时间: 2013-3-31 12:46
Nope.
2 set so 12 q’s, 10%.
Prudent man, softdollar, and the standard of pratice stuff. Wasn’t too hard from what I remember.作者: dandman 时间: 2013-3-31 12:47
BiPolarBoyBoston Wrote:
——————————————————-
Nope.
2 set so 12 q’s, 10%.
Prudent man, softdollar, and the standard of
pratice stuff. Wasn’t too hard from what I
remember.
seriously? It was VERY HARD作者: stockjaguar 时间: 2013-3-31 12:47
Thanks guys, i thought i might need to review those three cases just in case….作者: profil 时间: 2013-3-31 12:47
cfa boston,
i think he meant the case studies in the ethics section, not the items sets on the exam. i think u need some sleep. or some sex.作者: Valores 时间: 2013-3-31 12:47
I think you guys are talking about 2 different things..
He is not asking the # of vignettes.. there are a few case study chapters in the CFAI text.. were these examples explicitly tested? Im assuming no since they didn’t know what you were talking about作者: chandsingh 时间: 2013-3-31 12:47
Ok I don’t really remember. But no 3 cases. Def stuff on prudent investor/man, softdollar and the regular standard od pratice stuff.
I didn’t even know what the prudent investor/man was last year but i got 50%.
So if your level 1 ethics is ok just make sure you know your new material.作者: hw0799 时间: 2013-3-31 12:47
the show NY Wrote:
——————————————————-
cfa boston,
i think he meant the case studies in the ethics
section, not the items sets on the exam. i think
u need some sleep. or some sex.
haha I think so.作者: busterbluth 时间: 2013-3-31 12:47
last year i remember some research objectivity stuff..
