Board logo

标题: Status quo bias [打印本页]

作者: Matori    时间: 2013-4-22 14:18     标题: Status quo bias

Different sources define this differently. Is status quo bias sticking to your original forecast, or is it relying too heavily on recent information?
作者: spreads    时间: 2013-4-22 14:19

sticking..
作者: CFA4Techie    时间: 2013-4-22 14:19

Status quo is inertia. Laziness. Investor wont care to even look at the information. This is emotional bias, no information processing, no forecasting, no memorizing, no probability calculation and no cognitive errors.
作者: disiz64    时间: 2013-4-22 14:20

status quo - has nothing to do with information / forecasts.. Remember it is an emotional bias.
Information / forecasts start to creep in with Cognitive biases.
Information - sticking to old - is Conservatism. (Belief perseverance)
Information - updating based on new - is Representativeness (Sample size neglect/Base rate neglect). (Belief perseverance)

Another aspect to distinguish between Conservatism (belief pers) and Anchoring and Adjustment (Information processing) - In Anchoring and adjustment - you have new information about a company that its sales are going to be bad in the coming year/patent has not been approved / will be hurt by exports (things that tell you it is going down) - but past earning was 20$/share – you do not adjust that down.
作者: dyga    时间: 2013-4-22 14:20

how about in terms of defined contribtions when an investor sets his allocations and just leaves it?
thats status quo as well
作者: kseniaru    时间: 2013-4-22 14:21

that is true frankz888.
作者: dmar    时间: 2013-4-22 14:21

Another question: status quo trap (eco) is leaving variables as they are because of the past e.g 3% inflation, right? …i hate all these definitions and same wording in different chapters. Same for completion portfolio vs completion fund.
作者: noel    时间: 2013-4-22 14:22

what type of bias is presented when someone refuses to sell a losing position in hopes it will bounce back?
作者: rohitdoshi    时间: 2013-4-22 14:22

regret aversion
作者: kim226    时间: 2013-4-22 14:23

Should be gambler’s fallacy which is related to loss aversion
作者: KungFuPanda    时间: 2013-4-22 14:23

disposition effect - loss aversion
作者: RMontgomery    时间: 2013-4-22 14:24

From CFAI:
Loss aversion leads people to hold their losers even if an investment has little or no chance of going back up
Regret aversion can cause FMPs to hold onto positions too long. They are reluctant to sell because they fear that the position will increase in value and then they will regret having sold it.
I love BF!
i think we need more context like a statement “i really don’t like to lose” or “i feel i could regret this or that” in order to pick the right one…
作者: OmarAdnan    时间: 2013-4-22 14:24

Status quo bias and status quo trap look different?
It seems only Asset Allocation is consistent across study sessions. Others are kind of “segmented”.




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2