标题: CFA and Google Glasses [打印本页] 作者: sabre 时间: 2013-8-17 01:24 标题: CFA and Google Glasses
I am wondering if anyone has ever taken the CFA while wearing Google glasses. That person could go into an exam in Australia (the first time zone where the test will be given on test day). That person could record everything on the exam, and transmit it to candidates in most other time zones. That guy/girl could sell ‘subscriptions’ and make hundreds of millions of dollars. All subscribers would have a huge competitive advantage and the pass rates would be like 95%, or whatever. Arguably, the proctors wouldn’t be able to do anything about it, because that guy/girl would simply state that the glasses are medically necessary. Just a random thought …作者: Rasec 时间: 2013-8-17 01:27
That person would get caught from selling subscriptions online.
Not to mention a lot of places like casinos and government buildings already banned Google glass. It’s only a matter of time, when it’s commercially available, when CFA test centres ban it as well.作者: laurab 时间: 2013-8-17 01:30
^ +1
Cheating is a disgusting thing. Fail with dignity is better than pass with cheating.作者: Muddahudda 时间: 2013-8-17 01:32
claiming google glasses as a “medical necessity” ?
this is one of the dumbest arguments I’ve heard in a while.作者: skycfa 时间: 2013-8-17 01:35
Agreed. In fact, this is one of the stupidest posts I’ve heard in a while.作者: spreads 时间: 2013-8-17 01:40
Hey OP–RobertUCLA, Itera and Greenman all agree on something. That should tell you something.
There is a hell and it is frozen over.作者: jarobi04 时间: 2013-8-17 01:43
That’s like saying, why don’t people just smuggle spy-type cameras in the room to film the exam? You can try it, but you won’t want to get caught (which you probably will be).
Anyway, Google Glasses are hardly discrete. They do not really look like normal glasses.作者: morebeans 时间: 2013-8-17 01:51
What you have just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.作者: jcole21 时间: 2013-8-17 01:53
^
“Ok… a simple ‘Wrong’ would have done just fine.”作者: bigredhockey55 时间: 2013-8-17 01:56
^ no no I like what he said.作者: Muddahudda 时间: 2013-8-17 01:59
In case anyone missed the reference in WCT2010’s response http://youtu.be/p7w64fbqYQY
