Board logo

标题: Reading 2-II: Standards of Professional Conduct & Guida [打印本页]

作者: mayanfang1    时间: 2009-1-12 16:17     标题: [2009] Session 1: Reading 2-II: Standards of Professional Conduct & Guidance:

Q5. Myers has disclosed her partnership interest in the software company to Harrison, including the potential for additional compensation and the possible conflicts of interest.  

According to Standard II: Integrity of Capital Markets, Myers:

A)   has not violated the Standard since the information shared with Harrison was used to fulfill Ironclad’s fiduciary duty to avoid significant losses.

B)   has violated the Standard by sharing material nonpublic information with Harrison.

C)   has not violated the Standard by sharing material nonpublic information with Harrison because the information did not involve a tender offer.


作者: mayanfang1    时间: 2009-1-12 16:18

答案和详解如下:

Q5. Myers has disclosed her partnership interest in the software company to Harrison, including the potential for additional compensation and the possible conflicts of interest.  

According to Standard II: Integrity of Capital Markets, Myers:

A)   has not violated the Standard since the information shared with Harrison was used to fulfill Ironclad’s fiduciary duty to avoid significant losses.

B)   has violated the Standard by sharing material nonpublic information with Harrison.

C)   has not violated the Standard by sharing material nonpublic information with Harrison because the information did not involve a tender offer.

Correct answer is B)         

Although the information shared by Myers may have helped Ironclad’s clients avoid losses in shares of Breakthrough, the information was material nonpublic information. In this example, Myers’ software company owes a duty of loyal and confidentiality to Breakthrough. Information is “material” if its disclosure would have an impact on the stock or if a reasonable investor would want to know the information prior to making an investment decision. Material is “nonpublic” until it has been generally disseminated to the marketplace and investors have had an opportunity to react to the information. The information about Breakthrough’s pension difficulties was both material and nonpublic, as the stock dropped significantly upon disclosure of the information in the market. Therefore, Myers had a duty to keep the information confidential and not to trade, or cause others to trade, on the information.


作者: luck    时间: 2009-3-9 10:17

thx
作者: freya1215    时间: 2009-3-9 11:43

thank you
作者: lenny_chen    时间: 2009-3-10 17:12

x
作者: liqingguo    时间: 2009-3-13 15:57

b
作者: dandinghe4748    时间: 2009-4-17 10:59     标题: 回复:(mayanfang1)[2009] Session 1: Reading 2-II...

3x
作者: CFA6077653    时间: 2009-4-17 11:57

2
作者: siriussf80    时间: 2009-4-21 21:33

B
作者: lupinelp    时间: 2009-4-27 15:53

3X

 


作者: szg333    时间: 2009-5-1 19:46


作者: 虫虫飞    时间: 2009-5-2 11:47

thanks

 


作者: LegendL    时间: 2009-5-14 23:29

THX
作者: hitman1986    时间: 2009-5-15 23:55     标题: S

S
作者: hkgee    时间: 2009-6-2 22:59

z
作者: jrxx99    时间: 2009-12-16 13:06

看看看看看看看看看看看看
作者: venus6188    时间: 2010-2-25 14:38

[em64]
作者: htpeng    时间: 2010-3-5 04:32

b
作者: xiamity    时间: 2010-5-16 17:34

thanks




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2