Board logo

标题: Reading 24: Multinational Operations LOS d ~ Q94-96 [打印本页]

作者: mayanfang1    时间: 2009-1-20 13:25     标题: [2009] Session 6 - Reading 24: Multinational Operations LOS d ~ Q94-96

Q94. If Capriati uses the all-current method to translate Navratov’s income statement, the net profit margin will be:

A)   8.6%.

B)   10.1%.

C)   11.7%.

Q95. What is the difference in the translated receivables turnover ratio for Navratov Corp. between the temporal and all-current

     methods? The receivables turnover rate is:

A)   lower under the all-current method by 0.30x.

B)   the same under both methods.

C)   higher under the all-current method by 0.36x.

Q96. What is the difference in the total asset turnover ratio for Navratov Corp. between the temporal and all-current methods? The

     total asset turnover ratio is:

A)   higher under the all-current method.

B)   the same under both methods.

C)   lower under the all-current method.


作者: mayanfang1    时间: 2009-1-20 13:26

答案和详解如下:

Q94. If Capriati uses the all-current method to translate Navratov’s income statement, the net profit margin will be:

A)   8.6%.

B)   10.1%.

C)   11.7%.

Correct answer is B)

The net profit margin is a pure income statement ratio, meaning it will be unaffected by the application of the all-current method. The calculation is shown below:

Under the all current method, all income statement accounts will be translated at the average rate.

Revenue

7,400,000

$0.37

$2,738,000

Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)

(5,200,000)

$0.37

(1,924,000)

Depreciation

(1,200,000)

$0.37

(444,000)

Taxes

(250,000)

$0.37

(92,500)

Net Income

750,000

$0.37

$277,500

Note that under the all-current method, since all income statement accounts are translated at the same average rate, you do not have to translate the income statement to get the correct answer. (750,000 / 7,400,000) = 10.1%.

Q95. What is the difference in the translated receivables turnover ratio for Navratov Corp. between the temporal and all-current

     methods? The receivables turnover rate is:

A)   lower under the all-current method by 0.30x.

B)   the same under both methods.

C)   higher under the all-current method by 0.36x.

Correct answer is B)

The receivables turnover ratio is calculated as (sales / receivables). Under the both the all-current and temporal methods, sales are translated at the average rate, while receivables are translated at the current rate. Since both the sales and receivables components are translated at the same rate, there will be no difference in the ratios between the two methods.

Q96. What is the difference in the total asset turnover ratio for Navratov Corp. between the temporal and all-current methods? The

     total asset turnover ratio is:

A)   higher under the all-current method.

B)   the same under both methods.

C)   lower under the all-current method.

Correct answer is A)

The total asset turnover ratio = (sales / total assets)

We can see from the exchange rates that the Russian ruble is depreciating (it takes fewer dollars to buy a ruble). With a depreciating local currency, sales are going to be the same under either method, since sales are translated at the average rate. Assets on the other hand will be higher under the temporal method, and lower under the all-current method. This is because all assets are translated at the current rate under the all-current method (which has the lower exchange rate), and at different rates under the temporal method (which is has fixed assets converted at the higher historical rate). With the same numerator and lower denominator, the all-current method will lead to the higher total asset turnover ratio.


作者: luck    时间: 2009-2-16 01:43

[em02]
作者: hitman1986    时间: 2009-3-12 09:29

1
作者: xiaoming    时间: 2009-3-19 18:04

2
作者: yy21    时间: 2009-4-20 18:45     标题: 哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

呵呵哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
作者: lenny_chen    时间: 2009-5-6 16:17

x
作者: 虫虫飞    时间: 2009-5-11 23:17

thanks
作者: leeyaoxee    时间: 2009-5-20 23:40

thx
作者: harbuzi    时间: 2009-5-24 13:53

b
作者: saifudan    时间: 2009-5-26 16:51

 thx
作者: hkgee    时间: 2009-5-26 22:04

b
作者: frondzx    时间: 2009-5-26 23:50

up
作者: puiventi    时间: 2009-6-3 23:22

re
作者: hartzhou    时间: 2009-9-18 17:37

thanks
作者: twinsen1    时间: 2009-9-27 18:06

thanks
作者: jrxx99    时间: 2009-12-23 08:53

踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩
作者: mcdullpong    时间: 2010-2-14 18:04

 thnaks
作者: maxsimax    时间: 2010-2-21 16:56

thanks
作者: vinthus    时间: 2010-3-4 15:12

abc
作者: milkbaby    时间: 2010-3-10 21:51

zhe yi shou jian dian de ge
作者: suodi    时间: 2010-4-14 14:17

[em50]
作者: ArthurYeh    时间: 2010-5-18 10:16

 ty
作者: mmao    时间: 2010-5-18 22:13

 xx
作者: BlackWatch    时间: 2010-5-21 11:15

thx




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2