Board logo

标题: Reading 32: Mergers and Acquisitions LOS i~Q1-3 [打印本页]

作者: chenyu123    时间: 2009-3-3 16:09     标题: [2009] Session 9 -Reading 32: Mergers and Acquisitions LOS i~Q1-3

 

LOS i: Compare and contrast the three major methods for valuing a target company including the advantages and disadvantages of each.

Q1. Which of the following statements concerning valuation using discounted cash flow analysis of takeover candidates is least accurate?

A)   A disadvantage is that the model is difficult to customize.

B)   A disadvantage is that the model is difficult to apply when free cash flows are negative.

C)   An advantage is that the estimate is based on forecasts of fundamental conditions in the future rather than on current data.

 

Q2. Which of the following statements concerning valuation using comparable company analysis of takeover candidates is least accurate?

A)   An advantage is that the approach implicitly assumes that the market’s valuation of the comparable companies is accurate.

B)   An advantage is that data for comparable companies is usually easy to access.

C)   A disadvantage is that it is difficult to incorporate merger synergies or changing capital structures into the analysis.

 

Q3. Which of the following statements concerning valuation using comparable transaction analysis of takeover candidates is least accurate?

A)   An advantage is that estimates of value are derived directly from actual transactions, rather than from assumptions and estimates about the future.

B)   An advantage is that by using real transactions data as the basis of evaluation, the risk of future litigation concerning the proposed takeover price is reduced.

C)   A disadvantage is that since the approach uses data from actual transactions, it can be difficult to estimate the takeover premium.


作者: chenyu123    时间: 2009-3-3 16:10     标题: [2009] Session 9 -Reading 32: Mergers and Acquisitions LOS i~Q1-3

 

 

LOS i: Compare and contrast the three major methods for valuing a target company including the advantages and disadvantages of each. fficeffice" />

Q1. Which of the following statements concerning valuation using discounted cash flow analysis of takeover candidates is least accurate?

A)   A disadvantage is that the model is difficult to customize.

B)   A disadvantage is that the model is difficult to apply when free cash flows are negative.

C)   An advantage is that the estimate is based on forecasts of fundamental conditions in the future rather than on current data.

Correct answer is A)

An advantage of the discounted cash flow valuation approach is that the model is relatively easy to customize. Both remaining statements are correct as presented.

 

Q2. Which of the following statements concerning valuation using comparable company analysis of takeover candidates is least accurate?

A)   An advantage is that the approach implicitly assumes that the market’s valuation of the comparable companies is accurate.

B)   An advantage is that data for comparable companies is usually easy to access.

C)   A disadvantage is that it is difficult to incorporate merger synergies or changing capital structures into the analysis.

Correct answer is A)

The fact that the approach implicitly assumes that the market’s valuation of the comparable companies is accurate is a disadvantage if the assumption is not correct. Both remaining statements are correct as presented.

 

Q3. Which of the following statements concerning valuation using comparable transaction analysis of takeover candidates is least accurate?

A)   An advantage is that estimates of value are derived directly from actual transactions, rather than from assumptions and estimates about the future.

B)   An advantage is that by using real transactions data as the basis of evaluation, the risk of future litigation concerning the proposed takeover price is reduced.

C)   A disadvantage is that since the approach uses data from actual transactions, it can be difficult to estimate the takeover premium.

Correct answer is C)

The fact that the approach uses data from actual transactions is an advantage, since it is not necessary to estimate the takeover premium. Both remaining statements are correct as presented.

 


作者: yy21    时间: 2009-4-24 18:23     标题: 哈哈呵呵哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

哈哈哈哈
作者: harbuzi    时间: 2009-5-10 23:48

acc
作者: lenny_chen    时间: 2009-5-15 14:02

x
作者: Appleseed    时间: 2009-5-16 22:44

shenzhiwan
作者: hkgee    时间: 2009-5-19 13:19

b
作者: saifudan    时间: 2009-5-22 04:51

 thx
作者: leeyaoxee    时间: 2009-5-23 05:47

thx
作者: frondzx    时间: 2009-5-28 13:29

up
作者: hartzhou    时间: 2009-9-19 08:41

thanks
作者: yunchuan    时间: 2009-11-2 22:30

thks
作者: huwen    时间: 2009-11-10 18:13

谢谢
作者: jrxx99    时间: 2009-12-23 14:06

踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩
作者: maxsimax    时间: 2010-2-24 20:31

thanks
作者: suodi    时间: 2010-4-30 13:48

[em50]
作者: rabi_lj    时间: 2010-5-5 14:52

tkx
作者: powerhql    时间: 2010-5-20 17:56

Thanks for sharing it!
作者: mmao    时间: 2010-5-21 01:02

 thx
作者: lovemom    时间: 2010-7-14 23:39

thx
作者: mayhem001    时间: 2010-11-13 01:49

回复

回复

回复

回复






欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2