Board logo

标题: Reading 30: Dividends and Dividend Policy LOS m~ Q1-4 [打印本页]

作者: youzizhang    时间: 2009-3-4 14:58     标题: [2009] Session 8 -Reading 30: Dividends and Dividend Policy LOS m~ Q1-4

 

LOS m: Differentiate among the schools of thought on dividends (dividend irrelevance, dividend preference, and tax aversion), and discuss their implications for shareholder value and the price-to-earnings ratio.

Q1. The bird-in-the-hand argument is based on the assumption that:

A)   investors value expected capital gains more highly than expected dividends because of the lower tax rate on capital gains.

B)   investors are indifferent between dividends and capital gains.

C)   investors view dividends as being less risky than expected capital gains.

 

Q2. According to Modigliani and Miller’s dividend irrelevancy theory, an investor in a firm that does not pay a dividend can still earn a “dividend” on that company by:

A)   selling a portion of the company's stock each year.

B)   contacting the firm and asking for a dividend payment.

C)   buying additional shares each year.

 

Q3. In a world with taxes and brokerage costs:

A)   Modigliani and Miller say that dividend policy is irrelevant.

B)   dividend policy may be relevant.

C)   Modigliani and Miller say that dividend policy is relevant.

 

Q4. If Modigliani and Miller’s dividend irrelevancy theory is correct, what is the impact on a firm’s cost of capital and share price if its dividend payout increases?

          Cost of Capital                        Share Price

 

A)  An increase                            A decrease

B)  None                                       A decrease

C)  None                                       None


作者: youzizhang    时间: 2009-3-4 14:59     标题: [2009] Session 8 -Reading 30: Dividends and Dividend Policy LOS m~ Q1-4

 

 

LOS m: Differentiate among the schools of thought on dividends (dividend irrelevance, dividend preference, and tax aversion), and discuss their implications for shareholder value and the price-to-earnings ratio. fficeffice" />

Q1. The bird-in-the-hand argument is based on the assumption that:

A)   investors value expected capital gains more highly than expected dividends because of the lower tax rate on capital gains.

B)   investors are indifferent between dividends and capital gains.

C)   investors view dividends as being less risky than expected capital gains.

Correct answer is C)         

The Gordon/Lintner argument is called the bird-in-the-hand theory. Myron Gordon and John Lintner, argue that ks decreases as the dividend payout increases. Why? Because investors are less certain of receiving future capital gains from the reinvested retained earnings than they are of receiving current certain dividend payments. Gordon/Lintner argue that investors value a dollar of expected dividends more highly than a dollar of expected capital gains because the dividend yield component (D1/Po) is less risky than the growth component (g) in the total expected return equation:

 ks =D1/Po + g.

 

Q2. According to Modigliani and Miller’s dividend irrelevancy theory, an investor in a firm that does not pay a dividend can still earn a “dividend” on that company by:

A)   selling a portion of the company's stock each year.

B)   contacting the firm and asking for a dividend payment.

C)   buying additional shares each year.

Correct answer is A)

Miller and Modigliani’s dividend irrelevancy theory states that shareholders can in theory construct their own dividend policy. If a firm does not pay dividends, a shareholder who wants a 4% dividend can “create” it by selling 4% of his or her stock. Note that Modigliani and Miller’s theory does not allow for transaction costs or taxes. In actuality, shareholders will have to pay a brokerage commission on the sale and tax on any capital gains.

 

Q3. In a world with taxes and brokerage costs:

A)   Modigliani and Miller say that dividend policy is irrelevant.

B)   dividend policy may be relevant.

C)   Modigliani and Miller say that dividend policy is relevant.

Correct answer is B)

Modigliani and Miller assume a world without taxes and transaction costs. They (correctly) claim that the validity of their theory should be judged on empirical tests, not the realism of their assumptions. Myron Gordon and John Lintner have championed the “bird-in-the-hand” theory, which gives greater value to firms with high dividend yields because investors perceive dividends to be less risky than capital gains.

 

Q4. If Modigliani and Miller’s dividend irrelevancy theory is correct, what is the impact on a firm’s cost of capital and share price if its dividend payout increases?

          Cost of Capital                        Share Price

 

A)  An increase                            A decrease

B)  None                                       A decrease

C)  None                                       None

Correct answer is C)

If investors do not consider dividends to be relevant, the dividend payout will not affect the required rate of return. If the required rate of return does not change, the value of a firm will be unchanged despite the change in its dividend payout rate.

 

 


作者: yy21    时间: 2009-4-24 17:26     标题: 哈哈呵呵哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈


作者: dandinghe4748    时间: 2009-4-26 16:15     标题: 回复:(youzizhang)[2009] Session 8 -Reading 30: ...

3x
作者: CFA6077653    时间: 2009-5-4 16:12

3133
作者: harbuzi    时间: 2009-5-9 14:39

cabb
作者: lenny_chen    时间: 2009-5-13 14:44

x
作者: likui    时间: 2009-5-17 14:10

[em51]
作者: hkgee    时间: 2009-5-19 13:03

thanks!
作者: saifudan    时间: 2009-5-22 04:43

 thx
作者: leeyaoxee    时间: 2009-5-26 06:10

thx
作者: blustxz    时间: 2009-5-27 22:07

xz
作者: frondzx    时间: 2009-5-28 09:42

up
作者: aleko953    时间: 2009-6-2 10:26

1
作者: hartzhou    时间: 2009-9-19 09:04

thanks


作者: maisherry    时间: 2009-10-24 12:57

thx
作者: jrxx99    时间: 2009-12-23 14:23

踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩
作者: suodi    时间: 2010-4-29 16:45

[em50]
作者: powerhql    时间: 2010-5-19 20:50

Thanks for providing it!




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2