Board logo

标题: Reading 44: U.S. Portfolio Strategy: Seeking Value—Anato [打印本页]

作者: youzizhang    时间: 2009-3-9 17:25     标题: [2009] Session 12 - Reading 44: U.S. Portfolio Strategy: Seeking Value—Anato

 

LOS c: Illustrate why the PEG valuation technique must be used with care.

Q1. At a regional security analysts conference, Sandeep Singh made the following comment: "A PEG ratio is a very useful valuation metric because it generates meaningful results for all equities, regardless of the rate of dividend growth." Is Singh correct?

A)   No, because the PEG ratio generates highly questionable results for low-growth companies.

B)   Yes, because the expected dividend growth rate is cancelled out in the computation of the PEG ratio.

C)   Yes, because the computation of the PEG ratio does include the rate of expected dividend growth.

 

Q2. Two security analysts, Ramon Long and Sri Beujeau, disagree about certain aspects of the PEG ratio. Long argues that: "unlike typical valuation metrics that incorporate dividend discounting, the PEG ratio is unique because it generates meaningful results for firms with negative dividend discount growth prospects." Is Long correct?

A)   Yes, because the expected dividend growth rate is cancelled out in the computation of the PEG ratio.

B)   Yes, because the computation of the PEG ratio does not use the rate of expected dividend growth.

C)   No, because the PEG ratio generates meaningless results for low-growth companies.

 

Q3. Consider the statement: "Unlike many valuation metrics that incorporate dividend discounting, the PEG ratio may be used to value firms with zero expected dividend growth prospects." Is this statement correct?

A)   Yes, because the expected dividend growth rate is cancelled out in the computation of the PEG ratio.

B)   No, because the PEG ratio is undefined for zero-growth companies.

C)   Yes, because the computation of the PEG ratio does not use the rate of expected dividend growth.


作者: youzizhang    时间: 2009-3-9 17:26     标题: [2009] Session 12 - Reading 44: U.S. Portfolio Strategy: Seeking Value—Anato

 

 

LOS c: Illustrate why the PEG valuation technique must be used with care. fficeffice" />

Q1. At a regional security analysts conference, Sandeep Singh made the following comment: "A PEG ratio is a very useful valuation metric because it generates meaningful results for all equities, regardless of the rate of dividend growth." Is Singh correct?

A)   No, because the PEG ratio generates highly questionable results for low-growth companies.

B)   Yes, because the expected dividend growth rate is cancelled out in the computation of the PEG ratio.

C)   Yes, because the computation of the PEG ratio does include the rate of expected dividend growth.

Correct answer is A)

The PEG ratio measures the tradeoff between P/E and expected dividend growth (g). The formula for the PEG ratio is: PEG = (P/E) / g. PEG ratios generate questionable results for low-growth companies. Also, the PEG ratio is undefined for companies with zero expected growth (division by zero) or meaningless for companies with negative expected dividend growth.

 

Q2. Two security analysts, Ramon Long and Sri Beujeau, disagree about certain aspects of the PEG ratio. Long argues that: "unlike typical valuation metrics that incorporate dividend discounting, the PEG ratio is unique because it generates meaningful results for firms with negative dividend discount growth prospects." Is Long correct?

A)   Yes, because the expected dividend growth rate is cancelled out in the computation of the PEG ratio.

B)   Yes, because the computation of the PEG ratio does not use the rate of expected dividend growth.

C)   No, because the PEG ratio generates meaningless results for low-growth companies.

Correct answer is C)

The PEG ratio measures the tradeoff between P/E and expected dividend growth (g). The formula for the PEG ratio is: PEG = (P/E) / g. As such, firms with negative expected dividend growth will have a negative PEG ratio, which is meaningless.

 

Q3. Consider the statement: "Unlike many valuation metrics that incorporate dividend discounting, the PEG ratio may be used to value firms with zero expected dividend growth prospects." Is this statement correct?

A)   Yes, because the expected dividend growth rate is cancelled out in the computation of the PEG ratio.

B)   No, because the PEG ratio is undefined for zero-growth companies.

C)   Yes, because the computation of the PEG ratio does not use the rate of expected dividend growth.

Correct answer is B)

The PEG ratio measures the tradeoff between P/E and expected dividend growth (g). The formula for the PEG ratio is: PEG = (P/E) / g. Firms with zero expected dividend growth will have an infinite (or undefined) PEG ratio due to division by zero.


作者: hitman1986    时间: 2009-3-10 00:14

1
作者: cyyap1011    时间: 2009-3-10 13:59

thanks
作者: gary1111    时间: 2009-4-3 14:17

tx
作者: yy21    时间: 2009-4-21 14:04     标题: 哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

哈哈哈哈哈
作者: aleckkwong    时间: 2009-4-28 23:58

~
作者: dandinghe4748    时间: 2009-4-29 08:02     标题: 回复:(youzizhang)[2009] Session 12 - Reading 44...

3x
作者: harbuzi    时间: 2009-5-6 14:42

fd
作者: saifudan    时间: 2009-5-12 20:53

 thx
作者: lenny_chen    时间: 2009-5-20 14:21

x
作者: leeyaoxee    时间: 2009-5-26 08:49

thx
作者: blustxz    时间: 2009-5-29 22:12

xz
作者: hkgee    时间: 2009-6-1 22:15

z
作者: wwj_9876    时间: 2009-6-2 02:27

thx
作者: frondzx    时间: 2009-6-2 13:55

up
作者: yunchuan    时间: 2009-11-1 21:56

thks
作者: jrxx999    时间: 2009-12-23 17:03

踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩
作者: maxsimax    时间: 2010-2-22 21:00

thanks
作者: duo1115    时间: 2010-4-29 11:41

see
作者: ztlbox    时间: 2010-4-30 23:26

dd




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2