返回列表 发帖

CFA3不难,就像cet7一样。cet难吗?不难啊;cet别扭吧?别扭啊!一个道理。

 

3个月,每天3小时,其实已经很难了。因为这基本做不到。工作总是要加班啊,做这行的,不下班继续做功课少啊,项目来时,老板管tmd是不是要考试。家里总是有事情要处理啊,毕竟不是学生了,屋里不仅要放安静的书桌,还得放餐桌,还得放案板。无论哪些,只要发生,就意味着,你需要在其他时间去弥补这些必然发生的“意外”。。。。。我的经验之谈,还是得拉长战线,得按照春节投入作战的节奏去准备;1、2级就是这么过来的。

 

俺智商不需要你来怀疑,当初没拿状元,但也离状元差不了几名。英语水平也不需要质疑,姑且不说一二级已经过了;当年过cet6也就看了一礼拜。俺认识的过三级的朋友,一样努力,一样聪明,一样从最好学校出来,最后,是一样战战兢兢的过的这个CET7。和水平无关,和人品无关,只和运气有关。

 

cfa组织把中国通过率调低,这不是问题;问题是拿到这个paper之后,你会发现纯属废纸一张。

 

CFA考试现在是误人子弟,害人不浅啊。去google一搜索cfa,铺天盖地都是年薪20万美元,全国持证人数几十人,缺口几十万人,云云。。。。。都是那些狗娘养的依赖cfa培训欺骗牟利的狗娘养造的孽。所以,此帖,不是否认有神童存在,楼上如果真是考生,我不介意尊重你为超人;发帖的真正目的,就是要警示受骗进入cfa考试的人,慎重对待三年投入,你的黄金时间不到30年,你可以自由浪费的环境时间更不会超过5年!这个帖子给你一面真实的镜子。

[此贴子已经被作者于2010-7-20 22:47:36编辑过]

TOP

今天二级宣判,真是冰火两重天啊

TOP

最近好多人寻证cfa是否有用。。。。。

TOP

然后培训马甲就上来了。

真是无可奈何啊

TOP

https://www.cfainstitute.org/about/investor/Pages/gold_standard.aspx

 

CFAi的investor education的表述:

The CFA Charter as the Gold Standard

The global financial press comments on the value of the CFA charter

“A Masters will teach the principles (of finance), whereas the CFA refreshes those, and adds the specific rules related to products in various financial centres. Many recruits with a Masters will then sit CFA at the behest of their employer…CFA is a challenging qualification, requiring candidates not only to master theory, but detailed knowledge of regulations in particular jurisdictions. It typically takes three years to complete, involving a minimum of 250 hours (of study) a year.”
The Financial Times
22 June 2009

"The requirements to be an investment counsel or portfolio manager vary among the provinces, but they're in the process of being standardized. Often, though, an investment counsellor or portfolio manager will have earned all or part of the highly respected Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation. Gerry Ramos, a CFA holder and instructor for aspiring CFAs, said there are between 10,000 and 20,000 people with this designation in Canada. 'It's gathered a lot of traction because it's basically the gold standard for analytical work and portfolio management in the industry.'"
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
30 May 2009

 

TOP

嘿嘿,CFAi都用这个表述。何错之有?

 

另外,即使个别单词错了,此帖又岂是语法教育贴?能请教你这是何居心?!!能否做人别太歪?

 

TOP

香港海外升学中心:http://www.hkosc.com.hk/question_4561.html

The main difference between CFA and CFP is their recognitions and the syllabus. Generally speaking, CFA covers the topics of investment and for CFP, it is for financial planning.

So if you are a CFA holder, you can work in the field of finance as a financial analyst, ie. to invest in the financial market, and CFP, as a financial planner in the insurance companies.

Undoubtedly CFA has a higher recognition, as it is accepted as the standard worldwide.

To be qualified as a CFA holder, you should pass 3 papers(1 paper each year), and 4 years related working experience, their website is www.cfainstitute.org

The website of CFP is http://www.cfp.net/

 

TOP

美**国***政***…………府的描述http://www.puc.state.tx.us/ 

TOP

职业中心:http://news.gloriamundi.efinancialcareers.com/PAY_ITEM/newsItemId-15599

通篇都是cfa holder。你如果认为这个词不对,你可以别找工作

TOP

职业中介公司:http://financecareers.about.com/od/cfa/a/CFATestPrep.htm

还是通篇cfa holder,你有种撕烂了招聘人的嘴脸

TOP

返回列表