
- UID
- 222270
- 帖子
- 270
- 主题
- 53
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-2
- 最后登录
- 2014-6-27
|
I agree as well with respect to Question #43. Only thing I can think of is that it said “provide protection against losses,” instead of “provide some protection against losses.” This wasn’t on the mock errata, right? So what’s the best way to think about covered calls and downside protection – only that the premium buffers your losses somewhat, but they can trick you with wording, just like here. |
|