NakedPuts00

i got this question wrong and dont have it in front of me, but I remember thinking that since it showed similarities to the index with the top 30 funds it should be value since only value companies would be in the top 30. i dont know what I was thinking. I think the bottom line was that a few of the PE ratios and dividend yield gave conflicting views.

you are supposed to make a relative comparison to the index. lower PEs are value higher growth is growth. this one had both so market oriented. sorry thats best I can do without it in front. at least you get a bump a lump