Nishant1

cpk123, the problem, if there is one, is not with the conclusion. If you just zero in on “LS law applies” you’ll see what I mean - I simply don’t get why at that point in the sequence it is LS and not MS law applying.
So to understand my point you need to forget the final conclusion, and even ignore the LS law’s proviso (that business locality law applies).
I could ignore this seemingly trivial/pedantic point, but it has left me with the uneasy feeling that I’ve missed the whole point of the section…