Bad5shah

Brenda Simone is a money manager and the Blue Streets Pension Fund is one of her clients. The director of the pension fund calls Simone and asks her to use a particular broker so that the fund can obtain some research services with the soft dollars from that broker. Simone believes that the desired broker will provide the same price and execution as the normal broker that Simone uses. Simone does as the client wishes. Simone has:

A) not violated the Standards as long as the research provided by the broker will benefit Blue Streets.

B) violated the Standards.

C) not violated the Standards as long as the research provided by the broker will benefit the plan beneficiaries.

---

Simone must ensure that the research benefits the parties to whom she owes fiduciary duty, which are the plan participants.

Bad5shah

Dan Jeffries is a portfolio manager who is being sued by one of his clients for inappropriate investment advice. The Professional Conduct Program of CFA Institute is investigating Jeffries for the same offense. Jeffries settles the lawsuit with the client while the Professional Conduct Program investigation is ongoing. When the Professional Conduct Program staff questions Jeffries about the problematic investment advice, Jeffries claims he cannot talk about it because doing so would violate the confidentiality of his client. Jeffries has:

A) not violated the Standards by executing the settlement agreement or by refusing to talk about the case with the Professional Conduct Program.

B) violated the Standards by refusing to talk about the case with the Professional Conduct Program, but not by executing the settlement agreement.

C) violated the Standards by executing the settlement agreement, but not by refusing to talk about the case with the Professional Conduct Program.

---

Because the Professional Conduct Program will maintain client confidentiality, Standard III(E) Preservation of Confidentiality does not permit members to refuse to cooperate with a PCP investigation because of confidentiality concerns. The Standards do not require members to delay dealing with related legal matters while a PCP investigation is in progress.

Bad5shah

Patricia Hoolihan is an individual investment advisor who uses mutual funds for her clients. She typically chooses funds from a list of 40 funds that she has thoroughly researched. The Burns, a married couple that are a client, asked her to consider the Hawkeye fund for their portfolio. Hoolihan had not previously considered the fund because when she first conducted her research three years ago, Hawkeye was too small to be considered. However, the fund has now grown in value, and cursory research uncovers no fundamental flaws with the fund. She puts the fund in the Burns' portfolio but not in any of her other clients' portfolios. The fund ends up being the best performing fund on her list. Hoolihan has:

A) violated the Standards by not having a reasonable and adequate basis for making the recommendation.

B) violated the Standards by not dealing fairly with clients.

C) not violated the Standards.

---

Despite the fact the addition of the fund was successful, Hoolihan acted improperly in not conducting the same degree of research as she did for the other funds on her list.

Bad5shah

Lee Roth, who is an investment advisor, is riding in a taxi and finds a file of information labeled "Genco Valuation." The folder contains a great deal of financial data, projections and nonpublic information concerning the food products industry that lead Roth to believe that Genco will be worth 50% more than its current stock value. Roth also finds some correspondence that leads him to believe that the file belonged to Tom Hagan. Roth tries to find out where Hagan works so he can return the file. Roth can recommend Genco to his clients unless Hagan works for:

A) the corporate finance department for Genco.

B) Roth cannot recommend Genco to his clients at this time.

C) the equity research department for a brokerage firm.

---

The information is material and nonpublic; therefore, Roth cannot act or cause others to act at this time.

Bad5shah

Scott Marsh is a research analyst for a brokerage firm following the computer industry. Joe Perry is Marsh's former college roommate and is the head of technology for Mercury, a large software company. Perry informs Marsh on Tuesday that in two days the company will be making an official announcement that its release of its newest version of its software will be moved up one month, from October 1 to September 1. The announcement will be surprising to the industry and will likely be met with skepticism because the company has had trouble meeting release dates in the past. Perry assures Marsh that he is certain that they will meet the September 1 date. Marsh considers Perry to be very honest and highly competent. Marsh should:

A) immediately put out a report recommending the stock, but waiting until the official announcement to state his reasons.

B) produce his research report in two days based solely on the official announcement, not taking into consideration the information from Perry.

C) wait until the public announcement is made, then release a report explaining that he believes the company will make the release date, disclosing that one of the reasons for his opinion is Perry is a friend of his.

---

The research report cannot be released until the official announcement is made, otherwise he will be violating the Standard on prohibition against the use of material nonpublic information. Once it is made public, Marsh can disclose the nature of the conversation without violating that Standard because the information will now be public. However, he should disclose the relationship with Perry or he will be violating the Standard on communications with clients and prospective clients.

Bad5shah

While having a conversation with a prospective client, John Henry states that his performance across all of his past clients over the past five years was over 20%, which was 200 basis points higher than his benchmark. He tells the client that while the benchmark may rise or fall over time, his excess performance will remain consistent. Henry violated the Standards of Professional Conduct because:

A) the statement of excess performance is misleading with respect to its certainty.

B) he cannot discuss prospective future performance in any manner.

C) he cannot discuss performance without clearly stating that the composite does not conform to GIPS.

---

Guaranteeing performance on investments that are inherently volatile is misleading to clients.

Bad5shah

Jennifer Gates is an individual portfolio manager who only uses mutual funds for her clients; she has therefore never created a portfolio of stocks. She enters an Internet chat room on investments and starts answering questions about investments. She states in the chat room that she has a CFA designation. One woman in particular is interested and questions her about the viability of creating her own stock portfolio. Gates feels that this would be a mistake because she only has $150,000 to invest, and states, "I have experience creating stock portfolios, and it does not make sense to do so with only $150,000." The woman she has chatted with sends her an e-mail and eventually becomes a client of hers. Gates has:

A) violated the Standards by soliciting business over the Internet.

B) not violated the Standards.

C) violated the Standards by misrepresenting her experience.

---

One cannot misrepresent their experience, even over the Internet.

Bad5shah

Ned Brenan manages two dozen pension accounts, one of which earned over 25% during the past two years. Brenan tells prospective clients that based on past experience they can expect a 25% return on their funds. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

A) Brenan has violated Standard of Professional Conduct III(D), Performance Presentation, but Brenan has not violated Standard I(C), Misrepresentation.

B) Brenan has violated both Standard of Professional Conduct III(D), Performance Presentation, and Standard I(C), Misrepresentation.

C) Brenan has not violated Standard of Professional Conduct III(D), Performance Presentation, but Brenan has violated Standard I(C), Misrepresentation.

---

Brenan violated Standard of Professional Conduct III(D) by using only one portfolio’s results to create a false impression of all the portfolios, and Brenan violated Standard of Professional Conduct I(C) by creating the impression that a certain return was assured (he should have used the words “might” or “could” instead of “can”).

Bad5shah

While attending his wife’s office party, Donald North, CFA, overhears two top executives from Parker Industries discussing that the company’s Board of Directors just approved to omit its cash dividend due to unexpected losses during the quarter. Parker has paid a quarterly dividend for the past ten years. The next day, North calls his broker and instructs her to sell short Parker’s common stock.
While in a coffee shop, Diane South, CFA, overhears two top executives from Ryland Products say that their company is about to be acquired by another company for a substantial premium over the market price. The next day, South calls her broker and instructs him to buy 500 shares of Ryland’s common stock.
Which of the following statements about whether North and South violated Standard II(A), Material Nonpublic Information, is CORRECT?

A) North violated Standard II(A) but South did not violate Standard II(A).

B) Both North and South violated Standard II(A).

C) Neither North nor South violated Standards II(A).

---

According to Standard II(A), a member or candidate must not act or cause others to act on material nonpublic information until that same information is made public. In both cases, the information was material nonpublic information; therefore, both North and South are in violation.

Bad5shah

Maggie McCarthy is an individual investment advisor who uses mutual funds for her clients. She typically chooses from a list of 40 funds that she has thoroughly researched. The Figgs, a married couple that are a client, asked her to consider the Boilermaker fund for their portfolio. McCarthy had not previously considered the fund because when she first conducted her research three years ago, Boilermaker was too small to be considered. However, the fund has now grown in value, and after doing thorough research on Boilermaker, she found the fund was by far the most outstanding large company value fund in her list of funds. She puts the fund in the Figgs' portfolio, and in all new clients portfolios, but not in any of her other clients' portfolios. Her reasoning is that her existing clients were comfortable with their current holdings, and she did not want to risk disturbing their comfort. Has McCarthy violated any Standards? McCarthy has:

A) violated the Standards by not having a reasonable and adequate basis for making the recommendation.

B) not violated the Standards.

C) violated the Standards by not dealing fairly with clients.

---

The fund should have been considered for the existing clients' portfolios. There may have been reasons not to add the fund to their portfolios, such as tax consequences or a lack of suitability, but disturbing their comfort is not sufficient.