Ethics Can anyone really understand it...??? understand, necessary, sometimes, question

studyn

brave ones,
schweser vol 2
exam 2 (morning)
question 18
not a violation…: answer by schweser (“it is not necessary to provide the exact number of referral fees…just the details of the compensation…”), so the company did not violate the Standards…
and then when you check the “Bible”, the SPH says (page 127)
“…must disclose the nature of the benefit…together with the estimated value…”
i’m just tired of this subtle and discretionary interpretations that sometimes go to the left and others to right…no consistency here, is my opinion
if anyone did this question could please share opinion…
many thanks and keep sleeves rolled…