siavosh

Actually , now that I think about it , I don’t really understand it very well. In my mind , the words mean that you cannot “link” returns that are not created strictly according to GIPs standards ( applicable at that time? ) . That probably does not mean that you can get away with not showing the performance at all. In other words , if you are not compliant don’t geometrically link the return and then create a linked return number , but cannot avoid showing it for whatever it was .
In other words link 2007 to 2011 and create a number for overall. Also show the 2003 to 2006 separately unlinked to anything.
What do you guys think?