返回列表 发帖
Appreciate the reply - but the latest query isn't about the indifference between the two formulas. We've previously established that they are similar, quantitatively or otherwise. The question is a *conceptual* one - what's the reason behind re-stating the equation to formula #2 when estimating FCFE?

My take is that "...the fact that they are unable to predict the extent of their borrowings and outflow of interest way into the future (even though *assumed* target capital structure exists)..."

Anyone else able to shed a light on this please?

TOP

返回列表